Go back
Vaccine users dying in the Netherlands

Vaccine users dying in the Netherlands

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

-Removed-
I have not claimed anything other than what NZDDSOS have claimed, complete with their disclaimer, which was not hidden in the small print or on another page, or at another link, it was in fact, quite the opposite, hi-lighted with oversize bold text header at the very link I posted.

I am under no delusion that the incidents are difficult to prove and that there is a chance some of the incidents maybe coincidental, I am also aware, on the other hand that the list is far from complete, it represents only those who know of NZDSOS and who have submitted their story to be told by NZDSOS.

I do not believe they're 'silly' people on a 'silly list', that's just your sick sense of LOL humor. They are real people, with real concerns, vetted by NZDSOS so as to maintain the integrity of their site.

You got carried away with the might of your detective skills which was based on you discovering a paragraph headed 'disclaimer' in large bold text, this lead to the affected trashy 'so...ah"s and "LOL", and which eventually lead to your delusion that you could read minds, that you could know what other people know and don't know. That is your delusion, how far will you go to maintain it.


@wajoma said
An analogy
No. A literal citation from your own words, in which you contradict yourself.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@wajoma said
I work from home
"Work"

"Home"

You live in a camper van collect unemployment insurance.


@wajoma said
I have not claimed anything other than what NZDDSOS have claimed, complete with their disclaimer,
This is the fundamental lie.

You claim things that NZDDSOS explicitly, in their disclaimer, disclaimed.

You take their raw data without the disclaimer, and claim that that is what they say.

This is a lie. A very obvious lie.


@shallow-blue said
that
What is 'that'?


Australians waking up.



"Australians seeking compensation for being 'allegedly injured from COVID vaccines’"


@wajoma said
Australians waking up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXYla1jU58

"Australians seeking compensation for being 'allegedly injured from COVID vaccines’"
As per usual… a lawsuit by right-wing conspiracy nuts wanting money off the back of dumb arse conspiracy theories.

“Allegedly” is the prominent word in that report.

Literally billions of the covid vaccines have been given and the amount of people with an adverse effect are lower than with most other vaccine roll-outs.

Ultimately, any medication, fruit, nut or mineral can cause a negative reaction.

And, many of the symptoms reported have not been linked to the vaccine. And a good many also seem like the symptoms people could get from catching covid.

But you should know all this.
We’ve been over it a 100 times with you. And so, as with any post you deluded conspiracy nuts cough up, I’ll just answer with:

🥱


@shallow-blue said
"Work"

"Home"

You live in a camper van collect unemployment insurance.
This aligns well with the humor of the OP.

3 edits

@shallow-blue said
No. A literal citation from your own words, in which you contradict yourself.
shallow-blue: "Just imagine how schizophrenic you need to be to contradict yourself within seven words..."

shallow blue quoting my good self and the supposed seven word contradiction: "not anti-vaccine, if you believe the juice"

You sound like one of those LBGTQ+ ijits with their preferred pro-nouns. Not calling the clot-shot 'vaccine' is not what contradictions are made of. Clearly I'm not pro-seizure syrup, but nor am I anti-. Indifferent would be the best way to describe my stance on the juice, (the 62nd time?) and so indifferent to your preferred nouns for your medicine.

The shag doody/dilldo analogy was as dumbed down as possible, it's difficult to think of a lower level analogy.

I am not anti life sized latex horse dick replicas (the juice, 63rd time)
If shag doody believes stretching his butt with life sized horse dick replicas (taking the juice) benefits him in some way then he should absolutely continue doing that.
Shag doody should also pay for the latex replicas and any consequences of distorting his hole in this way (incontinence nappies)
Shag doody should not have to pay for latex replicas (juice) for other people, but if he is such an advocate for the benefits of butt hole stretching then he may choose to support others by voluntarily buying them horse dick dilldos (the juice).
To reiterate, I am not anti-horse dick latex replicas (the juice, 64th time) but I will not be buying them for others.


@shallow-blue said
No. A literal citation from your own words, in which you contradict yourself.
Here's a contradiction.

On the one hand shag doody for brains claims they're conspiracy theories

"As per usual… a lawsuit by right-wing conspiracy nuts wanting money off the back of dumb arse conspiracy theories."

Then a few lines later he concedes adverse effects, i.e. not conspiracy theories. Remembering that some of these adverse effects are final:

"Ultimately, any medication, fruit, nut or mineral can cause a negative reaction."

A question for shag doody. What makes these adverse effects 'right wing'?

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Now divegeeter don't go telling fibs, right at the top of my first post is the link to the page where the disclaimer is in plain site. It is common practice not to copy paste the whole page or the whole site. There is a lot of information besides the list and the disclaimer at:

https://nzdsos.com/2022/05/24/deaths-following-c-19-vaccination/
https://nzdsos.com/page-music-laughter/
https://nzdsos.com/professional-members/
https://nzdsos.com/who-we-are/

A good place to start:

https://nzdsos.com/

You might have had a point if I'd posted the list only, or if I'd gotten a little carried away (as you have with your detection skills) and embellished things, if the very first line of the very first post had not been a link to the page with the oversize bold text title of the disclaimer.

But there it is, if you refer back to the first post below shag doodys joke OP, like an invitation. And it is an invitation, because besides the disclaimer there is much more to the NZDSOS story, and the stories behind the list.

On the other thread, preceding the list I posted there, there was the link to 'Field of the Fallen' site or as shag doody prefers 'The Field of the Funnies'. I encourage people to visit these sites, the people who posted their stories did so because they wanted their story told.

Ok some will find these stories funny, a joke, an LOL, i.e. yourself, shag, kev ten-types-of-tard but that's their/your problem.

No secrets, no lies, no cover ups, first and foremost a link to the source of the info.

Where, why, when and how.

Unfortunately your 'Inspector Clouseau' award for innovative deep research has been revoked, Kato doesn't even want to know you.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
There're a lot of things not in my post. That's the idea of adding the link.

I'm fine with the disclaimer, as are the people that manage the site. I no more think you've sunk the ship with your advanced LOL skills than the managers of the site think their ship would be sunk if they were unlucky enough that one day the great detective divegeeter would come along and discover what no one else could see i.e. the oversize bold text saying 'disclaimer LOL**

It's all very open.

'LOL**' is mine