The company released a statement on Friday night saying that the malware code had been detected during a scan of a single company laptop. However, soon after publication of the Post’s story, it was revealed that the malware had only infected a utility company laptop that had no access whatsoever to the electrical grid.
Naturally, the US media promptly ran with the story as further evidence of Russian hacking of critical US infrastructure and national interests: the WaPo wrote "Russian operation hacked a Vermont utility, showing risk to U.S. electrical grid security, officials say" (originally the article's title was "Russian hackers penetrated U.S. electricity grid through a utility in Vermont, official say" which we now know was simply (fake news), the AP added "Vermont Utility Finds Malware Code Attributed to Russians."
According to some cybersecurity specialists, the code came from an outdated Ukrainian hacking tool. As RT notes, IT specialists that have analyzed the code and other evidence published by the US government are questioning whether it really proves a Russian connection, let alone a connection to the Russian government. Wordfence, a cybersecurity firm that specializes in protecting websites running WordPress, a PHP-based platform, published a report on the issue on Friday.
Wordfence said they had traced the malware code to a tool available online, which is apparently funded by donations, called P.A.S. that claims to be “made in Ukraine.” The version tested by the FBI/DHS report is 3.1.7, while the most current version available on the tool’s website is 4.1.1b.
"One might reasonably expect Russian intelligence operatives to develop their own tools or at least use current malicious tools from outside sources,” the report says.
The second part of the analysis deals with the list of IP addresses provided by the US agencies. The report says they “don’t appear to provide any association with Russia” and “are probably used by a wide range of other malicious actors.”
So lets gets this, NO penetration of the grid, Outdated malware and NO evidence linking the incident to the Russkies. Ouch!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-31/russian-hackers-said-penetrate-us-electricity-grid-using-outdated-ukrainian-malware
Originally posted by robbie carrobieZerohedge? RT?
The company released a statement on Friday night saying that the malware code had been detected during a scan of a single company laptop. However, soon after publication of the Post’s story, it was revealed that the malware had only infected a utility company laptop that had no access whatsoever to the electrical grid.
Naturally, the US media prom ...[text shortened]... s/2016-12-31/russian-hackers-said-penetrate-us-electricity-grid-using-outdated-ukrainian-malware
Please.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_electrichack-810pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.94a32655f963
Questioning sources without contradicting support?
Please.
Originally posted by HandyAndyYour report provides no evidence that it was either Russians nor Russian state sponsored hacking. Furthermore the headline has been altered from the original. Here is the original headline, a now discredited source of fake news.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-hackers-penetrated-us-electricity-grid-through-a-utility-in-vermont/2016/12/30/8fc90cc4-ceec-11e6-b8a2-8c2a61b0436f_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_electrichack-810pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.94a32655f963
https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/815041888273186819/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe Washington Post has been a highly acclaimed and reputable daily newspaper for many, many decades.
Your report provides no evidence that it was either Russians nor Russian state sponsored hacking. Furthermore the headline has been altered from the original. Here is the original headline, a now discredited source of fake news.
https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/815041888273186819/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
The sources Zero Hedge and RT (Russia Today) are strongly influenced, if not controlled, by the Russian government.
To each his own.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo you figure the Russians are just misunderstood school boys with no intent to do harm to the west?
Your report provides no evidence that it was either Russians nor Russian state sponsored hacking. Furthermore the headline has been altered from the original. Here is the original headline, a now discredited source of fake news.
https://twitter.com/ericgeller/status/815041888273186819/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
Just remember, you are pretty safe from such attacks, nobody is going after Scotland grids and such.
Originally posted by sonhouseNo, if you read the article you will understand that international espionage is a flourishing business. What I am actually saying is that the Washington Post article as it was initially presented was fake news, The Russians had not penetrated the grid and there was NO EVIDENCE that they had. The evidence that was proffered was that it was a piece of obsolete malware that anyone and I mean anyone can get from the internet and that the IP addresses could belong to anyone, but hey the Russkies did it. What a steaming pile of nonsense.
So you figure the Russians are just misunderstood school boys with no intent to do harm to the west?
Just remember, you are pretty safe from such attacks, nobody is going after Scotland grids and such.
Originally posted by HandyAndyThis nothing more than an argument ad populum, many people acclaim it therefore it must be good. What a piece of nonsense. The Washington Post was caught fabricating fake news, the evidence is there, deny it you cannot that is why you need to compensate for it with these lame references to how good it allegedly is. I agree a highly acclaimed faker of news at which it excels.
The Washington Post has been a highly acclaimed and reputable daily newspaper for many, many decades.
The sources Zero Hedge and RT (Russia Today) are strongly influenced, if not controlled, by the Russian government.
To each his own.
The BBC is government controlled and you suck that up. Have you any idea how biased and corrupt the BBC is?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe New York Times has the story now, along with The Associated Press, Reuters, The Guardian, all the major TV networks.
This nothing more than an argument ad populum, many people acclaim it therefore it must be good. What a piece of nonsense. The Washington Post was caught fabricating fake news, the evidence is there, deny it you cannot that is why you need to compensate for it with these lame references to how good it allegedly is. I agree a highly acclaimed faker ...[text shortened]... overnment controlled and you suck that up. Have you any idea how biased and corrupt the BBC is?
Wouldn't you be happier living in Moscow?