1. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    22 Aug '10 20:34
    What do you think of these two greats investing their fortunes in philanthropy?
  2. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    22 Aug '10 20:451 edit
    Originally posted by Black Star Uchess
    What do you think of these two greats investing their fortunes in philanthropy?
    I think it's a perfect argument for limiting the gift/estate tax charitable deduction.
  3. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    22 Aug '10 20:59
    You cynic! I didn't think of it like that though...

    I think its great, I'm not sure how best they can use the money.
  4. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    22 Aug '10 21:12
    Its an odd amount as it way to much to build an art gallery or public park like some do, but to little to be like a second WHO that Bill Gates seems to aspire to.

    Some sort of fund for innovation would be good
  5. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    22 Aug '10 21:20
    Originally posted by Black Star Uchess
    You cynic! I didn't think of it like that though...

    I think its great, I'm not sure how best they can use the money.
    Charity is all well and good, but the US government would stand to collect billions in estate tax from those two without the 100% charitable deduction. I don't see why my income tax should have to be higher so Bill Gates can decide which charitable causes are more worthy than others.

    Let Gates do what he wants with his money, but there's no policy justification for allowing this choice to reduce his estate tax to zero (or almost zero).
  6. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    22 Aug '10 22:03
    Is interesting. I guess Gates & Buffett would say they can allocate the money more effectively.
  7. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    or different places
    tinyurl.com/2tp8tyx8
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    22 Aug '10 22:11
    Originally posted by Black Star Uchess
    Is interesting. I guess Gates & Buffett would say they can allocate the money more effectively.
    They'd just pay the tax and not complain. Those two are liberals.
  8. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    22 Aug '10 23:24
    Originally posted by Black Star Uchess
    Is interesting. I guess Gates & Buffett would say they can allocate the money more effectively.
    Then they should run for political office.
  9. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    23 Aug '10 01:57
    Maybe they should ... in the UK local councils are a great example of how govt waists / mis allocates resources. I think those two, especially with Buffetts skills could allocate resources better
  10. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    23 Aug '10 08:41
    They should donate the money to science, so science can more effectively solve the world's problems. 😉
  11. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    23 Aug '10 11:32
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    They should donate the money to science, so science can more effectively solve the world's problems. 😉
    Good idea...

    after we get our cut though, in the form of a hefty estate tax bill
  12. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    23 Aug '10 14:09
    Originally posted by sh76
    Good idea...

    after we get our cut though, in the form of a hefty estate tax bill
    I'm sure you wouldn't be surprised if I told you I agree.
  13. Standard membersh76
    Civis Americanus Sum
    New York
    Joined
    26 Dec '07
    Moves
    17585
    23 Aug '10 14:18
    Originally posted by KazetNagorra
    I'm sure you wouldn't be surprised if I told you I agree.
    not at all 😉
  14. Joined
    09 Mar '09
    Moves
    27
    23 Aug '10 20:20
    The tax thing is funny.. I didn't realise that. But I would like to see some sharp minds like them look at the charity sector.

    One thing that bugs me is the way charity is so linked to advertising. e.g . MacMillan eclipse similar medical charity's in the UK, in fairness publicity is part of their job but charitys like that get disproportionate attention. Plus the animal ones - I wonder if you put a kitten and a baby on a poster which would get the most sometimes.

    Maybe they could allocate funds better? I checked out their website and it looks like a work in progress.
  15. Standard memberbill718
    Enigma
    Seattle
    Joined
    03 Sep '06
    Moves
    3298
    24 Aug '10 13:57
    Originally posted by Black Star Uchess
    What do you think of these two greats investing their fortunes in philanthropy?
    It's a lot more than Dick Cheney ever did!
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree