@AThousandYoung saidAnd I don’t feel that has anything to do with what you said, does it
I don't think explaining the nature of electron shells has anything to do with my opinion.
Thread 202401
@mike69 saidI'm not interested in how you "feel".
And I don’t feel that has anything to do with what you said, does it
When I was explaining the history of the Israel/Palestine region to Raj it wasn't about opinions. When I explained that a .223 was not a "high caliber sniper round" it was not opinion. I give facts and information all the time.
@AThousandYoung saidDumb comment, congrats you did a google search, I talked from experience.
I'm not interested in how you "feel".
When I was explaining the history of the Israel/Palestine region to Raj it wasn't about opinions. When I explained that a .223 was not a "high caliber sniper round" it was not opinion. I give facts and information all the time.
@AThousandYoung saidAnother opinion
That's known as the Argument From Anecdote which is logically fallacious.
You have been educated.
@mike69 said
Of the situation not the term
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
YOUR LOGICAL FALLACY IS...
anecdotal
You used a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence.
It's often much easier for people to believe someone's testimony as opposed to understanding complex data and variation across a continuum. Quantitative scientific measures are almost always more accurate than personal perceptions and experiences, but our inclination is to believe that which is tangible to us, and/or the word of someone we trust over a more 'abstract' statistical reality.
@AThousandYoung saidTry answering about topic do you have any insight?
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
@AThousandYoung saidRelate this to what I said about experience, I’ve shot thousands of these rounds seen their power and that of larger ones.https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/anecdotal
YOUR LOGICAL FALLACY IS...
anecdotal
You used a personal experience or an isolated example instead of a sound argument or compelling evidence.
It's often much easier for people to believe someone's testimony as opposed to understanding complex data and variation across a continuum. Quantitative scientific meas ...[text shortened]... gible to us, and/or the word of someone we trust over a more 'abstract' statistical reality.
@AThousandYoung saidYour just spewing dumb stuff that’s non related to try and make yourself feel intelligent. I’m trying to finish an episode of highlander before going back to work and have to keep restarting it, make a point to the subject or we can maybe continue later.
I thought you didn't want to hear my opinions.
1 edit
@AThousandYoung saidDo you, you did a google search about a certain round, so what I know more.
Do you have a point?
1 edit
Since you want to keep talking about firearm cartridges, many soldiers who had fired many weapons rejected the M16 because it was a "Mattel toy" with no "stopping power".
Those people were wrong.
Things have now changed due to increased levels of body armor being used so the Army is shifting to a new round but against human flesh at normal combat ranges and without violating the Geneva Conventions the .223 is king.