1 edit
Originally posted by generalissimoMmm. Your belief in free speech runs only so deep, it seems. DSR's banishment you lament, but the silencing of someone whose views you didn't agree with you do not lament, apparently. Never mind. Didn't have you down as a person of principle anyway. Just a pavlovian-partisan poster with odd self-serving definitions of things. Racism. Terrorism. Capitalism. Extremism. Islamophobia.
I guess she was banned for repediately posting extremist views on the debates.
How would you define "freedom of speech"? And with DSR aledgedly "victim" of censorship, and jlilly not a "victim" despite being subjected to censorship, one wonders what your definition of "victim" is.
Originally posted by FMFI never said I agreed with jlilly's banning, its true I didn't agree with her views, however I never said it was good that she got banned.
Mmm. Your belief in free speech runs only so deep, it seems. DSR's banishment you lament, but the silencing of someone whose views you didn't agree with you do not lament, apparently. Never mind. Didn't have you down as a person of principle anyway. Just a pavlovian-partisan poster with odd self-serving definitions of things. Racism. Terrorism. Capitalism. Extre ...[text shortened]... spite being subjected to censorship, one wonders what your definition of "victim" is.
Didn't have you down as a person of principle anyway.
You can think whatever you want, that doesn't mean what you think is true.
your claims are laughable, when was I a racist? or an extremist?
Originally posted by generalissimoI didn't say you were. Read my post again. I talked about what I see as your willfully askew and self-serving definitions of things such as racism, terrorism, capitalism, extremism, islamophobia.
your claims are laughable, when was I a racist? or an extremist?