I think nothing.
Except for the Sonhouse Chronicles, I have seen only one thing other than his judgment which is under appeal.
What has not happened (as of now):
•No known federal tax evasion indictment against Trump himself based solely on his tax return.
My granny says that millions and millions of dollars were spent investigating his tax returns. That could’ve paid the college tuition of at least 312 people. Selected people, that is. People that Biden would select.
You fellas are a damn mess
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidLiterally nobody "investigated" his tax returns.
I think nothing.
Except for the Sonhouse Chronicles, I have seen only one thing other than his judgment which is under appeal.
What has not happened (as of now):
•No known federal tax evasion indictment against Trump himself based solely on his tax return.
My granny says that millions and millions of dollars were spent investigating his tax returns. That could’v ...[text shortened]... 312 people. Selected people, that is. People that Biden would select.
You fellas are a damn mess
It feels like eons ago, but voters wanted to know if trump as president may present a conflict of interest to his business affairs. Of course now with his son in law simultaneously negotiating Saudi arms deals with the US government AND managing $10 billion of Saudi state money through his private company, we have blown past the guard rails.
@wildgrass saidThis one says there was no investigation π π π
Literally nobody "investigated" his tax returns.
It feels like eons ago, but voters wanted to know if trump as president may present a conflict of interest to his business affairs. Of course now with his son in law simultaneously negotiating Saudi arms deals with the US government AND managing $10 billion of Saudi state money through his private company, we have blown past the guard rails.
Then he writes clacktrap like Sonouse does. Oh golly, his son in law. Let me look that up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! π π
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidDo you have the reports / returns?
This one says there was no investigation π π π
Then he writes clacktrap like Sonouse does. Oh golly, his son in law. Let me look that up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! π π
I’ll gladly spend an hour checking them for you?
Oh. Wait. I don’t need to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_returns_of_Donald_Trump
trump is a tax dodger.
@shavixmir saidNo, I don't know who has his tax returns. If it is impt to you, you can google that too.
Do you have the reports / returns?
I’ll gladly spend an hour checking them for you?
See, you are a liberal and that past history (the School of Sonhhouse) is very important to you.
Not to us. We, and he , are busy!!!!!!!!
If you find it, please do not send us your findings.
Good man.
@AverageJoe1 saidYoure just talking about the public release of the tax returns right?
This one says there was no investigation π π π
Then he writes clacktrap like Sonouse does. Oh golly, his son in law. Let me look that up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! π π
Or if you think there was an investigation, what do you think took place?
@AverageJoe1 saidI already did, just for you.
No, I don't know who has his tax returns. If it is impt to you, you can google that too.
See, you are a liberal and that past history (the School of Sonhhouse) is very important to you.
Not to us. We, and he , are busy!!!!!!!!
If you find it, please do not send us your findings.
Good man.
@AverageJoe1 saidHoly crap, your spelling and your vocabulary are the worst I've ever seen from someone who thinks he's smarter than everyone else on an internet forum.
This one says there was no investigation π π π
Then he writes clacktrap like Sonouse does. Oh golly, his son in law. Let me look that up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! π π
And that is covering some yards, Bubba.
@AverageJoe1 saidWhy do you think he defunded the IRS? The agency probably won't last through this term.
I think nothing.
Except for the Sonhouse Chronicles, I have seen only one thing other than his judgment which is under appeal.
What has not happened (as of now):
•No known federal tax evasion indictment against Trump himself based solely on his tax return.
My granny says that millions and millions of dollars were spent investigating his tax returns. That could’v ...[text shortened]... 312 people. Selected people, that is. People that Biden would select.
You fellas are a damn mess
It's all part of his 'takedown' of the United States.
@wildgrass saidI’m not talking the returns. Actually I’m talking about you being hung up on tax returns that were investigated to no avail. You said should say now “It seems that they got nothingπ₯”. . But no, you have to ramble like Sonhouse. boring.
Youre just talking about the public release of the tax returns right?
Or if you think there was an investigation, what do you think took place?
Catch up. Trump innocent on tax returns, so let’s see what happens next.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidHuh? We never saw the returns. They ignored the subpoena I think. What's to investigate?
I’m not talking the returns. Actually I’m talking about you being hung up on tax returns that were investigated to no avail. You said should say now “It seems that they got nothingπ₯”. . But no, you have to ramble like Sonhouse. boring.
Catch up. Trump innocent on tax returns, so let’s see what happens next.
Most people just wanted to see them as informed voters should.
@wildgrass saidThere was no provision in the directives of the courts that the people, that would be you me, Suzanne, and marauder, should receive copies of the tax return returns. So that is why you never saw the returns.
Huh? We never saw the returns. They ignored the subpoena I think. What's to investigate?
Most people just wanted to see them as informed voters should.
So most people wanted to see them as informed voters should. It is my opinion that the citizens are not entitled to see the private tax returns of Donald Trump. So you and I are at a standoff. You liberal sure are a nosy bunch into things that are none of your business.
And wild grass, it would appear that the court did not think that the people were entitled to see them. So this means that you are wrong. Now write back yes I’m wrong about that. We were not entitled to see his tax returns.
@AverageJoe1 saidTrump blocked their release. That is why we never saw them.
There was no provision in the directives of the courts that the people, that would be you me, Suzanne, and marauder, should receive copies of the tax return returns. So that is why you never saw the returns.
So most people wanted to see them as informed voters should. It is my opinion that the citizens are not entitled to see the private tax returns of Donald Trum ...[text shortened]... you are wrong. Now write back yes I’m wrong about that. We were not entitled to see his tax returns.
@Suzianne said.?? You must be speaking of the fact that he did not want to release them. Well, since he did release them, your post is moot , At the time they were released the court said the citizens cannot see them. That ends this discussion.
Trump blocked their release. That is why we never saw them.
This is a great example of how you libs just cannot deal directly with an issue. Tax returns were demanded. Trump said I don’t want to do it, they said you have to do it, he said OK. The court said do not release them publicly. Why don’t you write the court, and quit writing us?