Who is that woman that decided to join the debate as Kamala's fact checker?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/debate-post-mortem-trump-was-trump-harris-held-and-moderators-played-partisan-tricks
Why didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate? Is this the new debate normal? Moderators are now fact checkers during the debates? Why didn't any moderator fact check Kamala's lies?
Even our debates are worse than Russia. The moderators are now allowed to tell you what is true and what is not in real time. I am pretty sure they did not have time to look it up that fast, yet they instantly knew what the facts are until they didn't.
1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:
Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program.
The ABC moderators said nothing.
2. "Fine People" Hoax:
Kamala Harris claimed Trump called neo-N*zi's "very fine people." This hoax was debunked by Snopes but the ABC moderators let it slide.
The ABC moderators said nothing.
3. Post-Birth Abortion:
Trump claimed babies were 'k*lled' outside the womb in failed abortions. Under Tim Walz, babies born alive in botched abortions are allowed to be left to d*e.
Eight babies who survived abortions in Minnesota were abandoned and sadly perished under Walz.
The ABC moderators simply said Trump was lying and moved on without adding context.
4. Defund the Police:
Kamala Harris laughed when Trump said she wanted to defund the police. During a previous interview, Harris said having more cops on the street is "wrong."
She also supported taking police officers out of schools.
The ABC moderators said nothing.
Who is that woman who selectively fact checked during the debate and why didn't she get fired? Is there no penalty for moderators who join the debate as fact checkers? How factual her fact check was is irrelevant. Why did Kamala need debate help from the moderators? Are we going to appoint fact checkers to each debater now?
Is there no penalty for moderators joining in on the debate? Or are we going to let moderators wield debate powers to sway public opinion in real time? And who picked those questions that were asked? Was it the woman who tried to join in on the debate as Kamala's fact checker toady? We all know who she has bias in favor. She didn't even try to hide it.
Why doesn't the corporate news media want to discuss the rogue moderator trying to hijack the debate to help Kamala as if Kamala cannot debate on her own? At what point should moderators be held accountable for debate interference? Didn't that moderator cross the line already? Or are we going to allow debate chaos take over?
@Metal-Brain saidI could tell just watching her talk and facial expressions before the debate even started she couldn’t stand him and would be biased.
Who is that woman that decided to join the debate as Kamala's fact checker?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/debate-post-mortem-trump-was-trump-harris-held-and-moderators-played-partisan-tricks
Why didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate? Is this the new debate normal? Moderators are now fact checkers during the debates? Why didn't any moderator ...[text shortened]... ence? Didn't that moderator cross the line already? Or are we going to allow debate chaos take over?
@Metal-Brain saidGun buybacks don't "confiscate" weapons. They involve gun owners voluntarily selling their guns with no questions asked.
1. Mandatory Firearm Buybacks:
Kamala Harris told Trump to "stop lying" about her wanting to confiscate firearms. Harris has previously stated multiple times that she wants to launch a mandatory buyback program.
You don't even know the definition of the words you use.
@mike69 saidYes. It is obvious she was biased against Trump.
I could tell just watching her talk and facial expressions before the debate even started she couldn’t stand him and would be biased.
That is why I want to know if she made up the debate questions. Meddling in these debates has happened before so this should be a big issue by now. Remember when Donna Brazile leaked the debate questions to Hitlery before the debate?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donna-brazile-leaves-cnn/
I'll bet Kamala knew every single debate question before the debate. They fixed the debate in her favor.
@Metal-Brain saidIt wouldn’t surprise me at all, very sad people.
Yes. It is obvious she was biased against Trump.
That is why I want to know if she made up the debate questions. Meddling in these debates has happened before so this should be a big issue by now. Remember when Donna Brazile leaked the debate questions to Hitlery before the debate?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donna-brazile-leaves-cnn/
I'll bet Kamala knew every single debate question before the debate. They fixed the debate in her favor.
@Metal-Brain saidWhy didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate?
Who is that woman that decided to join the debate as Kamala's fact checker?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/debate-post-mortem-trump-was-trump-harris-held-and-moderators-played-partisan-tricks
Why didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate? Is this the new debate normal? Moderators are now fact checkers during the debates? Why didn't any moderator ...[text shortened]... ence? Didn't that moderator cross the line already? Or are we going to allow debate chaos take over?
You're just angry and bitter that Kamala Harris won that debate by a country mile. Even FOX news said she did. Why don't you stop making excuses and accept the truth.
@Metal-Brain saidBuybacks by definition are voluntary.
Did she say "voluntarily"? Yes or no?
The point of buybacks: to incentivize people to turn in their guns. They are offered money, with no questions asked.
Your very first point attacks the moderators based on ignorance.
@mchill saidWho made up the debate questions? Was it her?
Why didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate?
You're just angry and bitter that Kamala Harris won that debate by a country mile. Even FOX news said she did. Why don't you stop making excuses and accept the truth.
You don't care do you? Satan himself could have wrote the debate questions and it would never bother you.
The moderator turned debate fact checker wrote the debate questions and gave them to Kamala before the debate just like Donna Brazile did for Hitlery, right?
@vivify saidNo. You made that up.
Buybacks by definition are voluntary.
The point of buybacks: to incentivize people to turn in their guns. They are offered money, with no questions asked.
Your very first point attacks the moderators based on ignorance.
Payment is sometimes a requirement in return for confiscation. FDR's gold confiscation for example.
Why does government need to do voluntary buybacks? Any gun show will attract people that will pay you for your gun.
@Metal-Brain saidhttps://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/essays/gun-buyback-programs.html
No. You made that up.
Gun buyback programs compensate individuals who turn over firearms to a public agency or private organization. In the United States, nearly all buyback programs are implemented at the county or city level, and participation is always voluntary.
@vivify saidThere have always been gun buybacks in the USA. You can sell your gun to just about anybody. Government is not needed unless it becomes mandatory like FDR's gold confiscation program. Also a buyback, but it is a confiscation. You have no choice in the matter.
https://www.rand.org/research/gun-policy/analysis/essays/gun-buyback-programs.html
Gun buyback programs compensate individuals who turn over firearms to a public agency or private organization. In the United States, nearly all buyback programs are implemented at the county or city level, and participation is always voluntary.
@mchill saidWhy wasn't Kamala fact checked in real time?
Why didn't she get fired for trying to join in on the debate?
You're just angry and bitter that Kamala Harris won that debate by a country mile. Even FOX news said she did. Why don't you stop making excuses and accept the truth.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13838115/presidential-debate-questions-abc-kamala-harris-donald-trump.html
@Metal-Brain saidI love seeing you drowning like this. You're like someone arguing lions aren't animals.
There have always been gun buybacks in the USA. You can sell your gun to just about anybody. Government is not needed unless it becomes mandatory like FDR's gold confiscation program. Also a buyback, but it is a confiscation. You have no choice in the matter.
definition and purpose of gun buybacks is all that's needed to prove you and your dumb source wrong.
@vivify saidThen FDR's gold confiscation program was not confiscation?
I love seeing you drowning like this. You're like someone arguing lions aren't animals.
definition and purpose of gun buybacks is all that's needed to prove you and your dumb source wrong.
Is that what you are saying?
Anyway, you are digressing. This thread is about moderators joining the debate.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13838115/presidential-debate-questions-abc-kamala-harris-donald-trump.html
Why didn't the moderators fact check Kamala in real time after she lied?
Is this the future of debates in the USA?