Go back
Where is the outrage?

Where is the outrage?

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
Obama won S Carolina with 51%, 'nuff said

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
Speakin of which, can anyone tell me a time when Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have been so silent on something like this? Here is what I think: they know that if they raise hell about Clinton, it will look like they are in Obama's corner and basically that will muddy him up by association with them. So they will stay out of it and hope he wins.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
What did they do that was racist? I must have missed that in the news.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
What did they do that was racist? I must have missed that in the news.
Do I agree with you? Yes. Amazingly so.
I've not heard them say anything racist yet (but then again I'm not really following their foolish campaign, because we all know the elections are rigged and the republiswines are going to win anyways).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
Cause don't you know, Bill and Hillary think the Democratic party is theirs. They know that after Hillary gets the nomination (she is winning in delegates, which is what counts), that the black voters will hold their noses and vote for her in the general election.

The liberals and Democrats have created a new 'slave class' with their social programs and welfare handouts. The people receiving the benefits aren't going tovote for someone who might cut that off.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
Because the Clintons aren't Republicans.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
What did they do that was racist? I must have missed that in the news.
That's surprising - the media were doing their damnest to hype it up - a rare failure on their part ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Merk
Because the Clintons aren't Republicans.
If they were, Kenneth Starr would still be an unknown noddy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
That's surprising - the media were doing their damnest to hype it up - a rare failure on their part ...
Hype up what? I've seen absolutely nothing in the news. What are you talking about?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by breedluv
Why has there not been a public outrage at the racist tactics of the Clintons during the South Carolina Primary? Why haven't they been tared and feather and run out on a rail?
It's because Bill Clinton is America's first Black President.🙄

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by SMSBear716
Cause don't you know, Bill and Hillary think the Democratic party is theirs. They know that after Hillary gets the nomination (she is winning in delegates, which is what counts), that the black voters will hold their noses and vote for her in the general election.

The liberals and Democrats have created a new 'slave class' with their social programs an ...[text shortened]... s. The people receiving the benefits aren't going tovote for someone who might cut that off.
That's right.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by treetalk
That's surprising - the media were doing their damnest to hype it up - a rare failure on their part ...
So, what have the Clintons said then that was racist?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
So, what have the Clintons said then that was racist?
That's been asked several times on this thread and no one has responded, so apparently the claim is so weak they're too embarrassed to reply and state their case.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
That's been asked several times on this thread and no one has responded, so apparently the claim is so weak they're too embarrassed to reply and state their case.
Suggestion : Go to google type in "racist tactics" then 'clinton' or any name you like, who ever has the most hits is using the most racist tactics.