- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
08 Oct 22
The evidence just keeps mounting, doesn't it?
How far does it have to go before we say enough?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/uknews/white-students-banned-from-black-history-month-events-at-westminster-university/ar-AA12IgcY?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=ddcb5050302742fa8f43fcee639e54b5
08 Oct 22
@jj-adams saidDumb arses.
The evidence just keeps mounting, doesn't it?
How far does it have to go before we say enough?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/uknews/white-students-banned-from-black-history-month-events-at-westminster-university/ar-AA12IgcY?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=ddcb5050302742fa8f43fcee639e54b5
Luckily it’s going to be one of those short-lived moronic hypes.
@shavixmir saidIt's a huge concern, mostly because of the lack of rejection by society. scary.
Dumb arses.
Luckily it’s going to be one of those short-lived moronic hypes.
I think the West is slowly giving up on its quest to end discrimination, and I think the US may go back to "Separate but Equal"
Sad days, man.
@earl-of-trumps saidIt will not be likely that cultures will be comfortably mixed in our lifetime. It will happen eons from now, we are seeing the nucleus of culture-mixing at this very moment, like seeing the first dinosaur crack out of an egg. We are witnessing history!! Glorious, indeed.
It's a huge concern, mostly because of the lack of rejection by society. scary.
I think the West is slowly giving up on its quest to end discrimination, and I think the US may go back to "Separate but Equal"
Sad days, man.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
08 Oct 22
@earl-of-trumps saidI think going back to separate but equal would be a good thing, problem is they don't want to be separate, they want to intrude on us but keep themselves separate when it pleases them. We however don't get that choice.
It's a huge concern, mostly because of the lack of rejection by society. scary.
I think the West is slowly giving up on its quest to end discrimination, and I think the US may go back to "Separate but Equal"
Sad days, man.
@jj-adams saidFirstly, let me say this... it is the WHITE LIBERAL pushing this bullscrap.
I think going back to separate but equal would be a good thing, problem is they don't want to be separate, they want to intrude on us but keep themselves separate when it pleases them. We however don't get that choice.
But they will push their agenda a little too strongly for a little too long, and WHAM.
Do they really think that everyone will be solid with schools that won't teach getting the correct answer in math,
or refuse to teach the works of Shakespear, Chaucer, Tolstoy etc...?
What will happen is, eventually, many folks will open charter schools to be able to save their children's education.
The "regular school" per se, will go to rot.
@earl-of-trumps saidNo, Earl, JJ is a white racist conservative
Firstly, let me say this... it is the WHITE LIBERAL pushing this bullscrap.
But they will push their agenda a little too strongly for a little too long, and WHAM.
Do they really think that everyone will be solid with schools that won't teach getting the correct answer in math,
or refuse to teach the works of Shakespear, Chaucer, Tolstoy etc...?
What will happ ...[text shortened]... schools to be able to save their children's education.
The "regular school" per se, will go to rot.
09 Oct 22
@jj-adams saidYou do realise that it’s because of people like you that the woke-community exists?
I think going back to separate but equal would be a good thing, problem is they don't want to be separate, they want to intrude on us but keep themselves separate when it pleases them. We however don't get that choice.
@shavixmir saidLet's clear something up: Woke is about being alert to and vigilant against racial injustice.
You do realise that it’s because of people like you that the woke-community exists?
Woke does NOT refer to men who want to wear dresses or people bitching about pronouns. How a call to action for blacks against discrimination got hijacked by politically-correct liberals who use "Latinx" is beyond me.
09 Oct 22
@vivify saidNo. I disagree.
And let's clear something up: Woke refers to being alert to and vigilant against racial injustice.
Woke does NOT refer to men who now want to be women or people bitching about pronouns. How a call to action for blacks against discrimination got hijacked by politically-correct liberals who use "Latinx" is beyond me.
I would say woke are these activist types that take matters too far.
#metoo calling Margareth Atwood anti-woman, for example, because she rationalised that there is a difference between slapping someone on the arse and raping them.
The vegetarian lobby, for example, pushing a plant-based diet down everyone’s throat, when only 5% of the population is vegetarian (to some extent).
University safe spots, because students don’t want to hear about WW2’s attrocities.
Gender pronouns, etc.
It’s not that these people are wrong. It’s that they’re exaggerating and calling everyone who questions their “quest” misguided.
Whole debates on the intraforum about diversity and inclusion. But if some colleague dares to give an opinion which differs, they all jump on that person and get his/ her post removed.
I am alert and vigilant to racial injustice, sexism in the workplace and an inclusive work environment. I am not politically correct or remotely woke though.
And these woke-retards, who generally think they’re completely correct and that their way is the only way are not only annoying, but they’re quite often counter-productive. Especially in the long term.
@shavixmir saidWhat you're describing are social-justice warriors. This is not what "woke" was originally about:
No. I disagree.
I would say woke are these activist types that take matters too far.
#metoo calling Margareth Atwood anti-woman, for example, because she rationalised that there is a difference between slapping someone on the arse and raping them.
The vegetarian lobby, for example, pushing a plant-based diet down everyone’s throat, when only 5% of the population is v ...[text shortened]... way are not only annoying, but they’re quite often counter-productive. Especially in the long term.
https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy
The term dates back to around the 1930s regarding being aware of and educated about racial injustice.
"Woke" has become corrupted by politically-correct activists who take matters too far. I'm just making a point that for decades the term was NOT associated with this farce by American liberals.
But none of that matters now, "woke" is a term that needs to be flushed since it's now a movement of retards. In other words, you're correct.
09 Oct 22
@vivify saidUntil a year or 2 ago I’d never even heard of the term.
What you're describing are social-justice warriors. This is not what "woke" was originally about:
https://www.vox.com/culture/21437879/stay-woke-wokeness-history-origin-evolution-controversy
The term dates back to around the 1930s regarding being aware of and educated about racial injustice.
"Woke" has become corrupted by politically-correct activists who take matt ...[text shortened]... term that needs to be flushed since it's now a movement of retards. In other words, you're correct.
But, then again, I’m just learning that Ancient Rome never existed and that tiktokkers have discovered a secred method of moving from one universe to another.
So the who the hell am I?