Go back

"Why can't Britain handle the truth about Winston Churchill?"

Debates

3 edits


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Again, you tried to hide behind a mathematical technicality. Yes, 51% could be called 'most.' Problem is you have also stated your literacy is superior to 'almost all' native speakers. Are you now going to claim that 'almost all' is 51%?

Or just dishonestly dodge the question?

Are you now going to downgrade your previous boast of being superior in literacy to almost all native speakers and say you are in fact superior to only 51% of native speakers?


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Is that code for you were wrong?


The post that was quoted here has been removed
Yet your response to my supposed extreme condescension was redolent with praise was it?

But best of all is your after the fact assertion of I knew that already. I suppose we just have to take your word for it.

And let's not forget the sticking point of your objection. You prefer major to primary. Understood. Aye aye Kapitan!


1 edit

2 edits

5 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
So Teinosuke has no reason to complain about my writing of him in the third person there.

I did not complain about your writing of me in the third person. Shavixmir, however, complained of my writing of us in the third person, which obviously I did for comic effect.

2) I recall Teinosuke writing that he attended Oxford University.

I have never written that I attended Oxford University, for if I had done it would be untrue. I may have written that I did my first degree at Cambridge University, for that would be true.

1 edit




1 edit



The post that was quoted here has been removed
We bow to your greatness oh magnificent one! Regale us with tales of your stupendous achievements and give us every exquisite detail of how the elites have embraced you. We are so honoured to have you grace our forum. Really we are.