01 Jul 10
I recently posted a question concerning a contentious OP, which the forum moderator has since removed.
FMF typically replied not by answering the question but by a gratuitous insult and an attempt to change the subject. Since he once evaded answering someone else's post by telling him "I have travelled the world, man" one must assume that he considers he 'knows it all', and that any other answer to a direct question is superfluous.
01 Jul 10
Originally posted by Bosse de NageThe obvious reason, except to oddballs like you and FMF, for the removal of the thread was that the forum moderator thought it unacceptable, thus answering my question by removing the cause of it.
He did answer your question -- just not to your satisfaction. But the removal of the thread shows the assumption that motivated your question to be false, so the point is moot.
FMF did not answer the question anymore than you did.
01 Jul 10
Originally posted by Sartor Resartussimple answer, because he (or she) is an impertinent troll.
I recently posted a question concerning a contentious OP, which the forum moderator has since removed.
FMF typically replied not by answering the question but by a gratuitous insult and an attempt to change the subject. Since he once evaded answering someone else's post by telling him "I have travelled the world, man" one must assume that he considers he 'knows it all', and that any other answer to a direct question is superfluous.