Go back
Why January 1st?

Why January 1st?

Debates

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere). Any other thoughts?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere).
I would propose the Vernal Equinox, as this has been used earlier. (That's why the word 'November', meaning 'ninth month' is our seventh month in our calendar.)
The Vernal Equinox is the time when the sun traverses the Equator going north.

Why not propose 4 weeks, equal 28 days, throughout the year, having as many leap days as needed for each particular year to start the new year with teh first of the first month too, and a Monday too, while we're at it.

But what we have is good enough. It's an akward system, but we're used to it. It takes too much effort to change the annual system.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere). Any other thoughts?
Isn't the winter solstice just as arbitrary as January 1st? What's the "objective significance"?

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere). Any other thoughts?
I think progressives would consider April 15, tax day, as their celebrating day. Of course, it would be somewhat bitter sweet since they all realize that no matter the tax rate, it will never be high enough. :'(

As for the winter solstice, that sounds a bit too paganish for my taste. 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

I WANT MY BIRTHDAY TO START THE YEAR.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I think progressives would consider April 15, tax day, as their celebrating day. Of course, it would be somewhat bitter sweet since they all realize that no matter the tax rate, it will never be high enough. :'(

As for the winter solstice, that sounds a bit too paganish for my taste. 😠
I don't know about new years but let's rename April 1st to April Whodey day.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Isn't the winter solstice just as arbitrary as January 1st? What's the "objective significance"?
Well, it has a direct significance for human beings as the date when the nights stop getting longer and start getting shorter again. Seems less arbitrary than January 1st anyway. The Spring Equinox, as proposed by FabianFnas, would also have a comparable significance, of course - but of the solstices and equinoxes, going with the Winter Solstice moves New Year's Day least from the current reckoning, which is desirable if you start messing about with something as fundamental as the calendar.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
As for the winter solstice, that sounds a bit too paganish for my taste. 😠
I think the Winter Solstice as New Year would suit the Christian calendar as well though - it would make Christmas the first festival of the new year, rather than the last of the old year, and this would be fitting given the symbolism of Christ bringing light into the darkness and hope to the world.

4 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I think progressives would consider April 15, tax day, as their celebrating day. Of course, it would be somewhat bitter sweet since they all realize that no matter the tax rate, it will never be high enough.
Actually, there is an interesting story in that. Until 1752, the start of the fiscal year in Britain was March 25 - Lady Day - long considered the start of the ecclesiastical year. In 1752, Britain converted from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar and so skipped eleven days from the calendar (September 2nd was followed by September 14th). People were thus faced with the prospect of paying a full year's tax from only 354 days' earnings. To avoid this, the start of the tax year was shifted forward eleven days to April 5th. From 1800, when February 29th was skipped in accordance with the Gregorian calendar, the tax year shifted forward one more day to April 6th. No comparable shift occurred in 1900, so April 6th remains the start of the British fiscal year.

Legend has it that when the calendar changed in 1752, mobs thought eleven days had been stolen from their lives, and stormed through London chanting "Give us back our eleven days". But they were probably just prototypical whodeys protesting about excessive taxation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Actually, there is an interesting story in that. Until 1752, the start of the fiscal year in Britain was March 25 - Lady Day - long considered the start of the ecclesiastical year. In 1752, Britain converted from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar and so skipped eleven days from the calendar (September 2nd was followed by September 14th). People were thu ...[text shortened]... days". But they were probably just prototypical whodeys protesting about excessive taxation.
The reason that New Years is the best day to celebrate is because it comes right after Christmas. Face it, people would rather have a holiday week/weeks, than just one day out of the month.

Give it up man!! 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Do you actually think I'm seriously advocating changing the calendar?

However, if we celebrated New Year at the winter solstice, you'd still have an extended holiday, with Christmas being the climax rather than the beginning.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere). Any other thoughts?
It's January 1st because I SAID SO!😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

The first day of the year is January 1st because January 1st is the first day of the year. Naturally.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Soothfast
The first day of the year is January 1st because January 1st is the first day of the year. Naturally.
Not naturally but artificially - which was the point that inspired this thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Teinosuke
Couldn't we find a more logical date to celebrate the New Year? I propose December 21st, the winter solstice, which would have an objective astronomical significance: the New Year would begin when the days start getting longer again (or shorter, in the Southern Hemisphere). Any other thoughts?
I think New Years should be moved to the 2nd of January because the streets of the south east Asian city where I live get so crowded on the evening of the 31st December and then, making it worse, most of the shops are closed on the 1st January.