30 Jul 10
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/world/asia/29wikileaks.html?_r=3
A search by The New York Times through a sampling of the documents released by the organization WikiLeaks found reports that gave the names or other identifying features of dozens of Afghan informants, potential defectors and others who were cooperating with American and NATO troops.
no1? Are you going to admit Wikileaks went too far? Do you remember names of informants being one of my key concerns when we first started this debate?
30 Jul 10
Originally posted by USArmyParatrooperIts obvious he is going to avoid offering any explanation to his over-zealous defense of the leak, but Im sure he knows he was wrong.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/world/asia/29wikileaks.html?_r=3
[quote]A search by The New York Times through a sampling of the documents released by the organization WikiLeaks found reports that gave the names or other identifying features of dozens of Afghan informants, potential defectors and others who were cooperating with American and N ...[text shortened]... ember names of informants being one of my key concerns when we first started this debate?