Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 30 Jul '10 01:53
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/world/asia/29wikileaks.html?_r=3

    A search by The New York Times through a sampling of the documents released by the organization WikiLeaks found reports that gave the names or other identifying features of dozens of Afghan informants, potential defectors and others who were cooperating with American and NATO troops.


    no1? Are you going to admit Wikileaks went too far? Do you remember names of informants being one of my key concerns when we first started this debate?
  2. 30 Jul '10 06:57
    I agree, they should have blanked them out.
  3. 30 Jul '10 17:33
    Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/29/world/asia/29wikileaks.html?_r=3

    [quote]A search by The New York Times through a sampling of the documents released by the organization WikiLeaks found reports that gave the names or other identifying features of dozens of Afghan informants, potential defectors and others who were cooperating with American and N ...[text shortened]... ember names of informants being one of my key concerns when we first started this debate?
    Its obvious he is going to avoid offering any explanation to his over-zealous defense of the leak, but Im sure he knows he was wrong.