Amazon is being attacked by their scurrilous union. You socialists, who really depend on group force, such as unions, had best watch out. Amazon, whose stock is up this morning, even in the face of the strike, has the largest industrial force of robots. So, if I were Bezos, I would order up a few thousand more robots, and trim off a few employees. Who needs employees? Do y'all know anyone who works there? Why give them a Christmas bonus.
Idiots
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=is+delta+unionized&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Note how successful Delta is. No Union!! (exceot for pilots ) Y'all are pro-union because of your 'group' nature, so this should interst you. Robot!! đ
3 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidAmazon is being attacked by their scurrilous union. You socialists, who really depend on group force, such as unions.
Amazon is being attacked by their scurrilous union. You socialists, who really depend on group force, such as unions, had best watch out. Amazon, whose stock is up this morning, even in the face of the strike, has the largest industrial force of robots. So, if I were Bezos, I would order up a few thousand more robots, and trim off a few employees. Who needs employees ...[text shortened]... pilots ) Y'all are pro-union because of your 'group' nature, so this should interst you. Robot!! đ
Did it ever occur to you Einstein that multi-billion-dollar companies are not shy about attacking their employees as a group force with their well-financed public relations people who spread propaganda to drones like you, and bought and paid for (labor hating) lawmakers, hell bent on keeping employees in the ranks of the working poor, all the while these companies are raking in billions every month in profits - then having the gall to cry and whail that they can't afford an extra penny for their workers.
I understand these companies are money grubbing pigs, what I don't understand is why lemmings like you blindly swallow their propaganda and if it's biblical scripture.
1 edit
@mchill said'Money grubbing' is a phrase used by people who feel like they are missing a 'piece of the pie' and have done nothing about their own pie, and thus resort to stuff like you write. What are you searching for, man?
Amazon is being attacked by their scurrilous union. You socialists, who really depend on group force, such as unions.
Did it ever occur to you Einstein that multi-billion-dollar companies are not shy about attacking their employees as a group force with their well-financed public relations people who spread propaganda to drones like you, and bought and paid for (labor hatin ...[text shortened]... understand is why lemmings like you blindly swallow their propaganda and if it's biblical scripture.
Look at you , wasting ink on corps who build your computer, which you do not have to buy. You do not even have to think about them......but you do. Why is that. Why don't you walk into my place of business and rant about the money, the so-called propoganda (which you do not have to listen to or read or believe, and then tell us what it has to do with you.?
I know one thing.....you did go to business school or study economics.
Your employer may have made $3M last year, you made $125k. Tell us, is that OK with you? If it is, then all your silly arguments about the wealthy can go in the trash can. If it is NOT OK, what is the solution? Take a shot, we are listening.
@AverageJoe1 saidPretty sure you do not want the working poor to 'take their shot' at the rich ... just sayin' đ
Take a shot, we are listening.
BTW, who do you think protects your 'property rights'?
1 edit
@spruce112358 saidThe law protects our rights. Like, you cannot get on my lawn!!âšī¸
Pretty sure you do not want the working poor to 'take their shot' at the rich ... just sayin' đ
BTW, who do you think protects your 'property rights'?
The lawMEN sometimes have to explain your trespass, and the illegalities committed by people that Biden let in before they were briefed on the law.
Was yours a serious question?
Edit: do you think that Mikehill will come back to me on this question of working for a man that makes a lot more money than he does. I want to know if he thinks that is OK or not OK and chat about it. I wish liberals would do such debating, but they will not. He will not.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo trick. đ
I give up. I fear atrick answer coming on
Think about this phrase: "That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"
'The Governed.' That's you and me. We don't ask anyone to protect our rights. WE protect our own rights. We constitute governments as a means to do what we have agreed to do: protect all our rights equally.
So here is a quiz: what happens if 'the governed' decide that protecting rich men's excessive amounts of property isn't as important as protecting other rights? The right to work. The right to live in a home. The right to raise a family. Etc.?
@spruce112358 saidI count on people that we elect and hire to protect our rights, from cretins and unsavory entities like Monsanto.
No trick. đ
Think about this phrase: "That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"
'The Governed.' That's you and me. We don't ask anyone to protect our rights. WE protect our own rights. We constitute governments as a means to do what we have agreed to do: protect all our rights eq ...[text shortened]... ing other rights? The right to work. The right to live in a home. The right to raise a family. Etc.?
If you wanted to go check if you put a register there I don’t know I could tell you that oh good the bad stop finally
So, we DO ask them to protect our rights. Whew. Libs are like ethereal flower children.
I look forward to tackling your quiz tomorrow, but you might rephrase the first all-encompassing sentence, which seems to impute a power to the governed to impact the private and , uhhhh, protected rights of rich people.
You can hardly ask such a question which has a false premiise.
1 edit
@AverageJoe1 saidAlmost. We HIRE and PAY government workers like Biden and Trump to protect our rights. But like any employees, they have to monitored, graded, checked, evaluated. đ
I count on people that we elect and hire to protect our rights, from cretins and unsavory entities like Monsanto.
If you wanted to go check if you put a register there I don’t know I could tell you that oh good the bad stop finally
So, we DO ask them to protect our rights. Whew. Libs are like ethereal flower children.
I look forward to tackling your qui ...[text shortened]... rotected rights of rich people.
You can hardly ask such a question which has a false premiise.
We pay them to do the job of protecting each others rights FOR us, so that we have time to go do other things. But it doesn't mean our responsibility goes away. If our workers (e.g. Biden and Trump) aren't do the job, WE have to do something about that.
@spruce112358 saidExactly correct, every word. Are you answering your own question??
Almost. We HIRE and PAY government workers like Biden and Trump to protect our rights. But like any employees, they have to monitored, graded, checked, evaluated. đ
We pay them to do the job of protecting each others rights FOR us, so that we have time to go do other things. But it doesn't mean our responsibility goes away. If our workers (e.g. Biden and Trump) aren't do the job, WE have to do something about that.
Geez.
@spruce112358 saidI still don’t get your point, your question about this quiz. So, the governed decide (vote) to protect rights more tha protect a rich man’s property ? Then, the vote would stand, and the rights of the citizenry would take precedent over the rights of a rich man to his property.
No trick. đ
Think about this phrase: "That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,"
'The Governed.' That's you and me. We don't ask anyone to protect our rights. WE protect our own rights. We constitute governments as a means to do what we have agreed to do: protect all our rights eq ...[text shortened]... ing other rights? The right to work. The right to live in a home. The right to raise a family. Etc.?
EG, if there is only one policeman, and he has to choose between which to protect, he would have to protect the property of the citizen. I think that is what you are saying. I still don’t know what one has to do with the other. The rich man’s just has to wait, I guess?
3 edits
@AverageJoe1 saidAre you really comparing the wealthy relying on the government to protect their property with Clint Eastwood's character in Gran Torino defending his own property with his own rifle?
The law protects our rights. Like, you cannot get on my lawn!!âšī¸
The lawMEN sometimes have to explain your trespass, and the illegalities committed by people that Biden let in before they were briefed on the law.
Was yours a serious question?
Edit: do you think that Mikehill will come back to me on this question of working for a man that makes a lot more mo ...[text shortened]... or not OK and chat about it. I wish liberals would do such debating, but they will not. He will not.
https://genius.com/John-steinbeck-chapter-5-the-grapes-of-wrath-annotated
John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath
“And that reminds me,” the driver said, “you better get out soon.
I’m going through the dooryard after dinner.”
“You filled in the well this morning.”
“I know. Had to keep the line straight. But I’m going through the dooryard after dinner. Got to keep the lines straight. And—well, you know Joe Davis, my old man, so I’ll tell you this. I got orders wherever there’s a family not moved out—if I have an accident—you know, get too close and cave the house in a little—well, I might get a couple of dollars. And my youngest kid never had no shoes yet.”
“I built it with my hands. Straightened old nails to put the sheathing on. Rafters are wired to the stringers with baling wire. It’s mine. I built it. You bump it down—I’ll be in the window with a rifle. You even come too close and I’ll pot you like a rabbit.”
“It’s not me. There’s nothing I can do. I’ll lose my job if I don’t do it. And look—suppose you kill me? They’ll just hang you, but long before you’re hung there’ll be another guy on the tractor, and he’ll bump the house down. You’re not killing the right guy.”
“That’s so,” the tenant said. “Who gave you orders? I’ll go after him. He’s the one to kill.”
“You’re wrong. He got his orders from the bank. The bank told him, ‘Clear those people out or it’s your job.’”
“Well, there’s a president of the bank. There’s a board of directors. I’ll fill up the magazine of the rifle and go into the bank.”
The driver said, “Fellow was telling me the bank gets orders from the East. The orders were, ’Make the land show profit or we’ll close you up.’”
“But where does it stop? Who can we shoot? I don’t aim to starve to death before I kill the man that’s starving me.”
“I don’t know. Maybe there’s nobody to shoot. Maybe the thing isn’t men at all. Maybe like you said, the property’s doing it. Anyway I told you my orders.”
“I got to figure,” the tenant said. “We all got to figure. There’s some way to stop this. It’s not like lightning or earthquakes. We’ve got a bad thing made by men, and by God that’s something we can change.”
@AThousandYoung said? I don’t get you. Govt protects everyone equally. The govt protected Wealthy Hunter, and also a guy who lives on maple street in the town depicted in Gran Torino?? So, all are protected by the govt. Don’t get your point there.
Are you really comparing the wealthy relying on the government to protect their property with Clint Eastwood's character in Gran Torino defending his own property with his own rifle?https://genius.com/John-steinbeck-chapter-5-the-grapes-of-wrath-annotated
John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath
“And that reminds me,” the driver said, “you better get ...[text shortened]... earthquakes. We’ve got a bad thing made by men, and by God that’s something we can change.”
Secondly, the govt should require everyone to have a firearm to protect themselves, and I am not being facetious, The town of Kenesaw GA has such a law. This is for security, if police (govt) cannot respond quickly enough. So Clint Eastwood is smart to have one. One of the people who are like Clint’s neighbors just set a woman fire (died) on a subway yesterday, so one should have a gun, and matches to set him on fire as well. I would strike the match. So, we agree?
Your post suggests I am comparing Hunter (wealthy) to Clint (a citizen)??
So since I am obviously not, your post is a waste of ink.
You would be tore all up on a debate stage.
It’s like libs cannot reason or find logic and common sense, so, they say stupid things. Stupid.
@AverageJoe1 saidDon't be silly. The government protects people in proportion to the amount of property that they own.
? I don’t get you. Govt protects everyone equally. The govt protected Wealthy Hunter, and also a guy who lives on maple street in the town depicted in Gran Torino?? So, all are protected by the govt. Don’t get your point there.
Secondly, the govt should require everyone to have a firearm to protect themselves, and I am not being facetious, The town of Kenesaw ...[text shortened]...
It’s like libs cannot reason or find logic and common sense, so, they say stupid things. Stupid.
I don't remember ever calling the government to protect my investment properties...because I don't own any!
See how that works?