20 Apr 16
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/6350795/World-has-less-than-five-years-to-stop-uncontrollable-climate-change-WWF.html
So within 5 years, if government around the globe does not curb carbon emissions dramatically, then nothing we do will stop run away global warming.
So let's say that 5 years passes without the uber dramatic legislation and we loose all hope. Can we go back to burning cheap coal?
20 Apr 16
Originally posted by whodeyThey keep adjusting the point of no return whodey. They need to make it just far enough into the future that there's enough time to bring the regulation raining down on us, but not so far that the panic and drama can't be amped up.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/earthnews/6350795/World-has-less-than-five-years-to-stop-uncontrollable-climate-change-WWF.html
So within 5 years, if government around the globe does not curb carbon emissions dramatically, then nothing we do will stop run away global warming.
So let's say that 5 years passes without the uber dramatic legislation and we loose all hope. Can we go back to burning cheap coal?
20 Apr 16
Originally posted by WajomaScience denier! ðŸ˜
They keep adjusting the point of no return whodey. They need to make it just far enough into the future that there's enough time to bring the regulation raining down on us, but not so far that the panic and drama can't be amped up.
20 Apr 16
Originally posted by apathistIt is articles like this that is making the issue a circus, not me. Articles like this are designed to stir people in the short term by making them believe that if they don't act now, the world will end. Well 5 years has come and gone, and according to the article we are now all doomed regardless.
Ha ha all a big joke. Just keep the bread and circuses coming tyvm.
Playing Chicken Little is not only annoying, it destroys credibility.
21 Apr 16
Originally posted by whodeyYeah, the article didn't actually claim the world was going to end. It claimed there would be catastrophic climate change. How about we take what steps we can so that the catastrophe is smaller than it otherwise would be?
So why not just leave the coal burners alone?
Why not just let us live what time we have in peace?
21 Apr 16
Originally posted by WajomaAh, just like the religious nutters proclaiming the end day are here.
They keep adjusting the point of no return whodey. They need to make it just far enough into the future that there's enough time to bring the regulation raining down on us, but not so far that the panic and drama can't be amped up.
No, Oh, wait, the end days are HERE.
Crap, no, NOW I tell you, end DAYS ARE HERE!
Originally posted by TeinosukeI see. So the nagging will be for a smaller catastrophe.
Yeah, the article didn't actually claim the world was going to end. It claimed there would be catastrophic climate change. How about we take what steps we can so that the catastrophe is smaller than it otherwise would be?
So the taxation for salvation mantra will continue.
21 Apr 16
Originally posted by sonhouseWell you have the religious and nonreligious saying pretty much the same thing, the end is near.
Ah, just like the religious nutters proclaiming the end day are here.
No, Oh, wait, the end days are HERE.
Crap, no, NOW I tell you, end DAYS ARE HERE!
What are the odds both are wrong? 😛