22 Mar 05
Don't you just wish the woman would die already and we could be done with it?
I've never seen such an uproar predicated on such nonsense. We all have the right to end our own life. Anyone arguing against it should simply be dispatched for the sake of all humanity. Conservative Christians defending this woman's right to live should find something better to do with their lives... like feeding the poor, not feeding the dead.
22 Mar 05
Originally posted by darvlayYet another referenc to Christians feeding the poor. This was also brought up in another thread. Seems the christians avoided that one for some reason.
Don't you just wish the woman would die already and we could be done with it?
I've never seen such an uproar predicated on such nonsense. We all have the right to end our own life. Anyone arguing against it should simply be dispatched for the sake of all humanity. Conservative Christians defending this woman's right to live should find something better to do with their lives... like feeding the poor, not feeding the dead.
Nyxie
22 Mar 05
Originally posted by darvlay
Don't you just wish the woman would die already and we could be done with it?
I've never seen such an uproar predicated on such nonsense. We all have the right to end our own life. Anyone arguing against it should simply be dispatched for the sake of all humanity. Conservative Christians defending this woman's right to live should find something better to do with their lives... like feeding the poor, not feeding the dead.
Do you look upon the National Disability Organisations who fight the developments in this field as "conservative Christians" ?
Should they also "be dispatched for the sake of all humanity" ?
24 Mar 05
1 edit
Originally posted by darvlayAs usual, you see only the very shallow pseudo lib point of view.
Don't you just wish the woman would die already and we could be done with it?
I've never seen such an uproar predicated on such nonsense. We all have the right to end our own life. Anyone arguing against it should simply be dispatche ...[text shortened]... o with their lives... like feeding the poor, not feeding the dead.
The real and only issue is "Does a damaged human deserve the same rights to the courts as a killer does"?
The activist judge "refuses" to allow a district court to hear an appeal to her death sentence.
His reasoning is that it will "magically" affect the right to abortion.
I have no clue. Do you? How is that related? More importantly... she is damaged beyond repair, but is still born of woman. She is human. So... should she not have the same right of appeal to a "death sentence" as anyone else? Why do we give obvious killers 25 years and every court in the land and refuse a damaged kid that same right to appeal to a higher court?
I know. Because you and all your left wing pseudo libs think it is cool to follow the media.
That's about it. Isn't it? If you really think she isn't a human... explain why an accident makes one an animal. Then go a step further and 'splain to us why animals are food and people are beings. If we fail to be a being because we are killed, do we deserve nothing? Are we then "kentucky fried" people? To be bought and sold at a whim?
then there is the very real possibility that the "accident" was murder.
Go figure.
24 Mar 05
1 edit
Originally posted by NyxieIn case you missed it. Catholic relief services fed more kids in africa in the last ten years than ALL OTHER RELIEF SERVICES COMBINED.
Yet another referenc to Christians feeding the poor. This was also brought up in another thread. Seems the christians avoided that one for some reason.
Nyxie
And as an atheist... that hurts. I thought my side could do better. Oh well.
I am sad that the catholics are better than us atheists. But hope to spur on a little healthy do-good-ism. Give. Till it hurts.
Catholics do it every day.
24 Mar 05
Originally posted by StarValleyWyI'm not asking for religions or groups. I was asking on a personal level.
In case you missed it. Catholic relief services fed more kids in africa in the last ten years than ALL OTHER RELIEF SERVICES COMBINED.
And as an atheist... that hurts. I thought my side could do better. Oh well.
I am sad that the catholics are better than us atheists. But hope to spur on a little healthy do-good-ism. Give. Till it hurts.
Catholics do it every day.
24 Mar 05
Originally posted by StarValleyWyLooks like another made-up statistic to me.
In case you missed it. Catholic relief services fed more kids in africa in the last ten years than ALL OTHER RELIEF SERVICES COMBINED.
And as an atheist... that hurts. I thought my side could do better. Oh well.
I am sad that the catholics are better than us atheists. But hope to spur on a little healthy do-good-ism. Give. Till it hurts.
Catholics do it every day.
24 Mar 05
Originally posted by RedmikeIt might be.
Looks like another made-up statistic to me.
Research the vatican relief agencies first. Then all fifty african catholic agencies.
Then we'll talk.
Actually... I researched the best way to give my money to africans in need last december as part of deciding what I would do as our family gift to the world instead of buying dumb plastic toys.
My wife spent ten hours and I spent about twenty and the best we could come up with was Catholic Relief Services for africa.
You can send your money where you want.