Originally posted by twhitehead
No, its just you that's lying.
The article in the OP says:
....the proposed provisions made no mention of goggles....
At no point in the article does it say that:
Progs in California want porn stars to wear goggles
You made that stuff up.
"One after another, scores of people who make porn films for a living pleaded their case to California workplace safety officials: Don’t force condoms or safety goggles or other devices designed to stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases on them because those devices will simply stop people from watching porn films and soon they’ll have no jobs at all"
The issue is wearing protective gear, whatever that may be. Should the state stick its nose in and force them to do whatever?