You can't make this stuff up

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/02/19/porn-stars-dont-force-us-to-wear-condoms-or-safety-goggles/?intcmp=hpff

Progs in California want porn stars to wear goggles

There's a genuine issue with condoms, but, apart from satisfying various specialist tastes or for comedy purposes, what is the point in safety goggles?

Nobody would have believed this 50 years ago.

Originally posted by DeepThought
There's a genuine issue with condoms, but, apart from satisfying various specialist tastes or for comedy purposes, what is the point in safety goggles?

Gettin' splatter in your eyeball......but then they should also require safety masks, right?

Originally posted by whodey
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/02/19/porn-stars-dont-force-us-to-wear-condoms-or-safety-goggles/?intcmp=hpff

Progs in California want porn stars to wear goggles

Well someone did make it up, because it just ain't true (as per usual with a whodey thread).
With so many bad things going on in the world one wonders why whodey goes to such lengths to find false stories to start every thread with?

Originally posted by twhitehead
Well someone did make it up, because it just ain't true (as per usual with a whodey thread).
With so many bad things going on in the world one wonders why whodey goes to such lengths to find false stories to start every thread with?

Are you saying Fox news is lying? 😲

Originally posted by FishHead111
Nobody would have believed this 50 years ago.

50 years ago you still had people with some moral fiber.

But we've been "transformed".

Originally posted by whodey
Are you saying Fox news is lying? 😲

No, its just you that's lying.

The article in the OP says:

....the proposed provisions made no mention of goggles....

At no point in the article does it say that:

Progs in California want porn stars to wear goggles

You made that stuff up.

So let me get this straight, if you pay for sex you get arrested, but add a camera then all you need are goggles and a rubber?

Originally posted by twhitehead
No, its just you that's lying.

The article in the OP says:

....the proposed provisions made no mention of goggles....

At no point in the article does it say that:

Progs in California want porn stars to wear goggles

You made that stuff up.

Read dingleberry

"One after another, scores of people who make porn films for a living pleaded their case to California workplace safety officials: Don’t force condoms or safety goggles or other devices designed to stop the spread of sexually transmitted diseases on them because those devices will simply stop people from watching porn films and soon they’ll have no jobs at all"

The issue is wearing protective gear, whatever that may be. Should the state stick its nose in and force them to do whatever?

Originally posted by FishHead111
Nobody would have believed this 50 years ago.

Nor iPhones.

Originally posted by whodey
So let me get this straight, if you pay for sex you get arrested, but add a camera then all you need are goggles and a rubber?

Is paying for sex illegal in your country?
Man - you are in the dark ages.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
Is paying for sex illegal in your country?
Man - you are in the dark ages.

Indeed, although we take it in the arse every day from our political leaders and pay a steep price for it.

For everyone else, it's illegal.

Originally posted by whodey
So let me get this straight, if you pay for sex you get arrested, but add a camera then all you need are goggles and a rubber?

Instead of hiring prostitutes, maybe you should just start making porn then?

Originally posted by whodey
Read dingleberry

Yes, I can read. That doesn't change the fact that you lied, and you made up the claim in the OP.