Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency and bringing everyone together in his inaugural speech????
Losers and pansies all. Toughen up, children. Put it all on the table. The lap top, the raid manuscripts!!!!!!
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
@averagejoe1 saidliberal crickets!
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
@averagejoe1 saidLiterally anything to avoid facing the truth.
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
My, my, how deep your rabbit hole is.
@sonhouse saidHow do you know all of this ahead of everyone else? You got an inside track, obviously. Enlighten us, with facts, further.
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
@averagejoe1 saidUh… judge… warrant… etc.
How do you know all of this ahead of everyone else? You got an inside track, obviously. Enlighten us, with facts, further.
@sonhouse saidIs that how you hang now?
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
He never did hang; he sticks out a little little bit.
5 edits
@averagejoe1 saidDear Joe -
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
1. Search warrant affidavits are almost never made public before charges and often remain permanently under seal if charges are never filed. However, once prosecutors open a criminal case, any warrant affidavits used during the inquiry will generally be turned over to the defense — though not in a public manner — as part of the discovery process.
2. It was a Federal Judge who approved these redactions, not "You Libs"
3. Donald Trump doesn't get to decide what is released
4. Joe Biden is not the Attorney General and does not run the Justice Department
5. Neither Mark Zuckerberg nor Facebook had anything to do with Donald Trump stealing these boxes of Government documents and illegally taking them to his home
Your nonsensical rant is 100% wrong. I feel embarrassed for you. Aren't you ashamed to put such ignorance in display for all to see like this? 😲
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidWhy does/did Trump want to release state secrets? There are intelligence operatives under cover in dangerous parts of the world that would have been exposed if some of those SCI documents had gotten out, and Trump was ready to sell them to the highest bidder. This was YOUR president, you idiots.
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
I don't give half a rat's ass about Facebook. It can die in a fire as far as I care.
@averagejoe1 saidback the blue
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449