Originally posted by StarrmanSure, but tilt-shifting (for miniature faking) already involves manipulations of blur depth and increasing colour contrasts. Chopping out frames also helps in creating the illusion of miniatures.
@Palynka, whilst this is tilt-shift (usually done for still image), it needs a lot of compositing on top to make it work as video footage. Chopping out frames, increasing colour and blur depth etc.
In short, I'm missing the point of your post... 😞
Originally posted by PalynkaI'm saying that the compositing process (which isn't involved in still image tilt-shift work) on top of the tilt-shift process is necessary to make the video work. The point wasn't huge, I just mentionted it because I'm a compositor.
Sure, but tilt-shifting (for miniature faking) already involves manipulations of blur depth and increasing colour contrasts. Chopping out frames also helps in creating the illusion of miniatures.
In short, I'm missing the point of your post... 😞
1 edit
Originally posted by StarrmanAh, ok. I'm used to thinking of tilt-shift as mostly post-processing (i.e. potatoshopped), but I guess it's true that the original (and probably more precise) meaning of tilt-shift was all about lens rotation and movement.
I'm saying that the compositing process (which isn't involved in still image tilt-shift work) on top of the tilt-shift process is necessary to make the video work. The point wasn't huge, I just mentionted it because I'm a compositor.
Point taken.