2014 RHP Public Forum Individuality Survey

Question: If all active contributors to Red Hot Pawn Public Forums thought as you think
and communicated in the same style as you, these public forums would become:

A. Awesome (daily activity would quintuple the first week)

B. Much More Enjoyable

C. More Enjoyable

D. About the Same

E. Less Enjoyable

F. Much Less Enjoyable

G. Only two members would still post (just Russ and you)

Responses: Please select 1) Your 2014 RHP Public Forum Individuality Survey Reply Letter A-G for yourself;
and also 2) Reply Letter A-G you think a majority of other active contributors would choose for you.

Default Choices: Reply Letters 1) C. and 2) E. will be assumed as the choice of those who read this thread
without participating. Reply Letters 1) A. and 2) B. will be assumed for those who post a Thumbs Down.

Mine: 1) C. and 2) G. lol

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Mine: 1) C. and 2) G. lol

1) B
2) C

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]2014 RHP Public Forum Individuality Survey

Question: If all active contributors to Red Hot Pawn Public Forums thought as you think
and communicated in the same style as you, these public forums would become:

A. Awesome (daily activity would quintuple the first week)

B. Much More Enjoyable

C. More Enjoyable

D. About the Same

E. ...[text shortened]... t participating. Reply Letters 1) A. and 2) B. will be assumed for those who post a Thumbs Down.[/b]

1) A
2) no clue

multiple interaction on a chat site is always going to be benefitial, however it has been to my sadness, most people will not even say hi or grunt.

Originally posted by jeremyjester
multiple interaction on a chat site is always going to be benefitial, however it has been to my sadness, most people will not even say hi or grunt.

1) G - It'd just be weird and echoey
2) G

1) A
2) A

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
1) A
2) A

Originally posted by redbadger
surely A A A

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
Nah, remember I'm Canadian and as such far too polite to overdo it. Two are plenty.

F