Go back
@ hopscotch

@ hopscotch

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

The answer is 234,980.12

You're welcome.

Vote Up
Vote Down

No it isn't.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I am not going to express it in Boolean terms.

I thought it was clear during the last Wet Buffaloes' meeting.

1 edit
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Moreover, young man, as you already know, any profile envelope is recursively enumerable.

I hope we won't have this conversation anymore.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
I am not going to express it in Boolean terms.

I thought it was clear during the last Wet Buffaloes' meeting.
Then why doesn't it have a 7 in it? We need to subtract 3 from the total or the Naked Chancellor will veto the movement without remorse.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by hopscotch
Then why doesn't it have a 7 in it? We need to subtract 3 from the total or the Naked Chancellor will veto the movement without remorse.
The position of the Naked Chancellor has been weakened after the extravagant
abridgment by Deacon Supreme.

I wouldn't worry that much for the 7 when The Catharsis Level II is imminent.

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Diversion tactic noted.

Thank you, young man.

He dares to be a fool, and that is the first step in the direction of wisdom.
~James Huneker

-----------------------------------------

Vote Up
Vote Down

WOW!!! Total and complete nonsense in a thread!!

Well I guess its like all the rest after all.😞

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KJCavalier
WOW!!! Total and complete nonsense in a thread!!

Well I guess its like all the rest after all.😞
Nanoo nanoo...

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KJCavalier
WOW!!! Total and complete nonsense in a thread!!

Well I guess its like all the rest after all.😞
I wouldn't worry too much. On the grander scale of things this is probably not even 0.[WORD TOO LONG] of a waste of binary space - just on this site. 😉

Edit: Press 'quote and reply' to see my post! 😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Moreover, young man, as you already know, any [b]profile envelope is recursively enumerable.

I hope we won't have this conversation anymore.[/b]
Rec for "recursively enumerable". Wow, Seitse... and to think some of my miserable convoluted stuff gets perceived as abstruse.




~~~ GB 😀 SOA~~

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
Diversion tactic noted.

Thank you, young man.

He dares to be a fool, and that is the first step in the direction of wisdom.
~James Huneker

-----------------------------------------
Fresh out of recs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Rec for [b]"recursively enumerable". Wow, Seitse... and to think some of my miserable convoluted stuff gets perceived as abstruse.




~~~ GB 😀 SOA~~[/b]
I still have some bunnies in my hat, Bob 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
I still have some bunnies in my hat, Bob 🙂
If you need variety, you can also use Turing-recognizable. The chicks love that one.