Go back
A little less recs and a lot more action.

A little less recs and a lot more action.

General

g
11 games waiting

far from u I hope

Joined
04 Jun 04
Moves
4146
Clock
12 Jan 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Recently the forums have gotten worse. And instead of trying to fix them, we encourge this behavior by giving recs. We had the shrinkage tread that earned a number of recs. A more recent one was "you're such a ass, (name)" which earned at least five. We have people using Our Lord's name in vain. We had the nose picking tread which wasn't bad; infact that was the best laugh I've had in a long time. The only reason that didn't get my rec was because of the unnecessary" don't pick your nose during sex". Instead I alerted it.

I give recs because I agree with what the poster says or I think it's funny, (as long as it's clean), not because they ask for a rec or make some sex joke. I encourage all of you to refrain from makeing these posts and alert others accordingly to make these forums a better place. This also goes for our avatars. They are getting pretty bad too.

I hope it didn't sound like I was an alert freak and I sit around all day waiting for posts to alert. I really hate to do it. I'm not trying to be a mod, but we all need to help out and get the x number of alerts, otherwise they might not be removed/hidden at all.

-reagan

invigorate
Only 1 F in Uckfield

Buxted UK

Joined
27 Feb 02
Moves
257441
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

I think being rude about someone sake of it is often pointleess and unfunny. However sometimes a witty sexual conatation makes us all laugh. I say clean living is not as fun as smutty living.

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
12 Jan 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gameover9
Recently the forums have gotten worse. And instead of trying to fix them, we encourge this behavior by giving recs. We had the shrinkage tread that earned a number of recs. A more recent one was "you're such a ass, (name)" which ear ...[text shortened]... , otherwise they might not be removed/hidden at all.

-reagan
There's nothing wrong or offensive about sex, Reagan.

This is a public forum and it should be encouraged that people should be themselves and not conform to what a small minority of people think is "proper".

A forum that is totally void of discussions of sex, jokes (lewd or clean), heated debates and impeccable bad taste is not a "better place" at all.

Sorry.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
There's nothing wrong or offensive about sex, Reagan.

This is a public forum and it should be encouraged that people should be themselves and not conform to what a small majority of people think is "proper".

A forum that is totally void of discussions of sex, jokes (lewd or clean), heated debates and impeccable bad taste is not a "better place" at all.

Sorry.
Actually, there is. Sex comes up, and that is fine. Next someone says something else... that might be ok. Next someone comes in to say something more out-there just to be more spectacular.

Next thing you know, what are we talking about? What is being said? Who knows, but it all starts as one thing said that escalates as each poster sees what they can get away with.

Just my feelings on that subject.

P

g
11 games waiting

far from u I hope

Joined
04 Jun 04
Moves
4146
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
There's nothing wrong or offensive about sex, Reagan.

This is a public forum and it should be encouraged that people should be themselves and not conform to what a small majority of people think is "proper".

A forum that is totally void of discussions of sex, jokes (lewd or clean), heated debates and impeccable bad taste is not a "better place" at all.

Sorry.
Those things should not be dissused in pubic though. It is the union between a married man, woman and God.

People being "themselves" is that what we want? Do we want this site to be like this world that we live in today?

BTW, I said nothing about heated debates. Sometimes those are good to have.

-reagan

A

Joined
14 Jun 04
Moves
2260
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Simple answer here, Reagan. If you think it is going to offend you. don't read it.

Favs

Selby, UK

Joined
02 Dec 04
Moves
154891
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Alpha10
Simple answer here, Reagan. If you think it is going to offend you. don't read it.
Absolutely - but how can Reagan know if she is going to be offended before she reads it.

Maybe there should be some kind of control - I've just started a game with someone who is ten years old. Some of the jokes (including one's I've come out with) are pretty unsuitable. Maybe Russ needs to place some kind of warning on the Forums List page.

A

Joined
14 Jun 04
Moves
2260
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

At the first sign of anything crude to you, change threads. It's that simple. Or, you can try not to be so......prudish.

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Favs
Absolutely - but how can Reagan know if she is going to be offended before she reads it.

Maybe there should be some kind of control - I've just started a game with someone who is ten years old. Some of the jokes (including one's I've come out with) are pretty unsuitable. Maybe Russ needs to place some kind of warning on the Forums List page.
There should be no one on this site that is 10.

Favs

Selby, UK

Joined
02 Dec 04
Moves
154891
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
There should be no one on this site that is 10.

Maybe he was lulling me into a false sense of security......

P
Mystic Meg

tinyurl.com/3sbbwd4

Joined
27 Mar 03
Moves
17242
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Favs
Maybe he was lulling me into a false sense of security......
When I used to go the the library chess club... I always played my HARDEST against the little kids... cuz they CAN beat you if they play well.

WM

Joined
06 Feb 04
Moves
15409
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Alpha10
Simple answer here, Reagan. If you think it is going to offend you. don't read it.
I suggest that is not a simple answer.People that have concerns about the direction these forums are taking do so ,I think,with not just their own feelings but also for others, who have turned away from the forums because they feel that they are degenerating into the lowest common denominator.In everything there is middle ground.Its a ,not to fine line ,where everyone except those that demand the highest standards and those that demand no standards should be able to meet.Just my opinion.Mike

g
11 games waiting

far from u I hope

Joined
04 Jun 04
Moves
4146
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Alpha10
Simple answer here, Reagan. If you think it is going to offend you. don't read it.
That's not the point. I am trying to stand up for what is right. Even if I don't read it there are going to be people that will and I don't think a lot of these posts are suitable for people of any age. Besides, why should I have to skip posts and treads? I know some people have higher standards than others and no forum will ever suit anybody. All I'm asking for is a little more moderation on the community's part, for everybodys sake.

Favs, just to let you know, I'm a guy.

A

Joined
14 Jun 04
Moves
2260
Clock
12 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Should the opinions of a few people change the forums everybody loves so much?

g
11 games waiting

far from u I hope

Joined
04 Jun 04
Moves
4146
Clock
12 Jan 05
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Actually it should be a place where even the people who demand the hightest standards can come too.

-reagan

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.