Go back
Amphigory Only

Amphigory Only

General

coquette
Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1121345
Clock
05 Oct 15

As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
05 Oct 15

Originally posted by coquette
As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.
"cq wears a wig?" ~child anon

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
05 Oct 15

All mimsey wor the Bloodnocks,
Grit-pipe-thin knee-knocks,
Whilst Bluebottle drinks not,
Hardly never, methinks.

coquette
Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1121345
Clock
05 Oct 15

imagine what you could be if only

then forget about it

we are what we are and not what we aren't

except in those few cases where they intersect into amphigorical nuance

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
06 Oct 15

Originally posted by coquette
imagine what you could be if only

then forget about it

we are what we are and not what we aren't

except in those few cases where they intersect into amphigorical nuance
contextualized?

coquette
Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1121345
Clock
06 Oct 15

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
contextualized?
that question is direct and to the point falling fall short of the requisite amphogoricality

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
06 Oct 15
1 edit

He bobcockled gramply
Tween the boresome gam.
Distortalot was his wamply,
Scaretending a "Forum Ban".



edit: for spelling

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669974
Clock
06 Oct 15

Originally posted by coquette
As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.
So you intend that it should go not only this way but also that way?

Something new and exciting!

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
06 Oct 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

rookie54
free tazer tickles..

wildly content...

Joined
09 Mar 08
Moves
205586
Clock
06 Oct 15

pretending to be sly,
bounced higher than high...
never stating a reason why,
the icicle did die...

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
06 Oct 15
1 edit

Originally posted by coquette
that question is direct and to the point falling fall short of the requisite amphogoricality
"So we're engaged here in an exclusive public conversation [anomaly unintended] touching on exquisitely nuanced social observations that meet the unwritten paradigms of 'requisite amphogoricality'?" ~Cynthia Cyberspace (my friends like child anon's Mum call me Cyn)

coquette
Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1121345
Clock
07 Oct 15

why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever

Grampy Bobby
Boston Lad

USA

Joined
14 Jul 07
Moves
43012
Clock
07 Oct 15

Originally posted by coquette
why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever
or a feather nestled in a hammock swaying to the unheard music of a gentle breeze

moonbus
Über-Nerd (emeritus)

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8703
Clock
07 Oct 15

Twaddletwits amore,
Crankyswonks galore,
mud in yor aye,
or humble pi,
"Furtwangler" he swore!

coquette
Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1121345
Clock
07 Oct 15

Originally posted by moonbus
Twaddletwits amore,
Crankyswonks galore,
mud in yor aye,
or humble pi,
"Furtwangler" he swore!
i think that made sense

it's a matter of concern

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.