Go back
Amphigory Only

Amphigory Only

General

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by coquette
As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.
"cq wears a wig?" ~child anon

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

All mimsey wor the Bloodnocks,
Grit-pipe-thin knee-knocks,
Whilst Bluebottle drinks not,
Hardly never, methinks.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

imagine what you could be if only

then forget about it

we are what we are and not what we aren't

except in those few cases where they intersect into amphigorical nuance

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by coquette
imagine what you could be if only

then forget about it

we are what we are and not what we aren't

except in those few cases where they intersect into amphigorical nuance
contextualized?

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
contextualized?
that question is direct and to the point falling fall short of the requisite amphogoricality

1 edit
Vote Up
4
Vote Down
-1

He bobcockled gramply
Tween the boresome gam.
Distortalot was his wamply,
Scaretending a "Forum Ban".



edit: for spelling

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by coquette
As opposed to all the other threads that lack this quality.
So you intend that it should go not only this way but also that way?

Something new and exciting!

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
1
Vote Down

pretending to be sly,
bounced higher than high...
never stating a reason why,
the icicle did die...

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down
-3

Originally posted by coquette
that question is direct and to the point falling fall short of the requisite amphogoricality
"So we're engaged here in an exclusive public conversation [anomaly unintended] touching on exquisitely nuanced social observations that meet the unwritten paradigms of 'requisite amphogoricality'?" ~Cynthia Cyberspace (my friends like child anon's Mum call me Cyn)

Vote Up
2
Vote Down

why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever

Vote Up
Vote Down
-2

Originally posted by coquette
why only amphigory,why not disambiguation or even quasitransubstantiation which would be more like bread and wine into crackers and beer, far less meaningful than a transformation into a whatever
or a feather nestled in a hammock swaying to the unheard music of a gentle breeze

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Twaddletwits amore,
Crankyswonks galore,
mud in yor aye,
or humble pi,
"Furtwangler" he swore!

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by moonbus
Twaddletwits amore,
Crankyswonks galore,
mud in yor aye,
or humble pi,
"Furtwangler" he swore!
i think that made sense

it's a matter of concern