1 edit
I wonder if he used the same tactless tactics on the bank managers as he used in his tirades against jews and the US? Maybe the owners of the bank are Jewish. More details may come out in the court case though.
Also, it could be the US behind it. Maybe by transferring his assets to the Icelandic bank, the US can pursue legal claims against him more easily. Just a guess.
Originally posted by geniusStrange that a bank would insist on losing out on S2.5 million dollars in assets. Obviously this is something very unusual; why shouldn't we believe that it was done because of animus against Fischer?
"Questioned about possible grounds for this unparalleled action by the USB, Mr. Fischer says that this decision is obviously targeted at his person"
sounds like another classic "i'm not paranoid, they really are out to get me!" fischer moment...
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZNo Aristotelian logic applied, yet pure inductive reasoning.
I think the last thing you could call No1 was anti-semetic.
And do you actually have any evidence that No1 isn't who he claims to be?
If your observations of the phenomenal pattern are
different than mine, you surely have reached a different
temporary conclusion.
😉