Go back
Antinomies...

Antinomies...

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

I'll understand this thread more when I figure it out.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Iron Monkey
#1 is only troublesome if uttered by a Cretan.

aren't these examples of paradoxes, rather than antimonies?
If Nordlys wrote, "All Norwegians are liars", believe the sentence

would deliver an identical self-contradictory/paradoxical punch.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Antinomy: An apparent contradiction between valid principles or
conclusions that seem equally necessary and reasonable. Built-in
contradiction, conflict or opposition of one law to another. Not to be
confused with 'antimony', one of the metallic elements.

#1 The only well remembered line of the Cretan poet Epimenides
is one of the oldest exampl ...[text shortened]... his sentence is false."


#3 ________________________________________________________
#3

Always remember that you are unique....just like everybody else.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by uzless
#3

Always remember that you are unique....just like everybody else.
Still laughing heartily...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
If Nordlys wrote, "All Norwegians are liars", believe the sentence

would deliver an identical self-contradictory/paradoxical punch.
sure, but #1 refers to Cretans. of course, you can specify

#1' "All Norwgeians are liars", which would be an example of the paradox if uttered by a Norwegian.

since you're interested in the topic of antimonies, why not check out the Wikipedia entry, which discusses Kant's antimonies. as 'antimony' is understood in the Kantian sense, the Epimenides paradox probably wouldn't be one. one of the kantian antiomonies involves the possibility or impossibility of an infinite past, so there's a serendipitous tie-in to your 'bookends' thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Still laughing heartily...
It can also be boiled down too...

Everybody is Unique

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Iron Monkey
sure, but #1 refers to Cretans. of course, you can specify

#1' "All Norwgeians are liars", which would be an example of the paradox if uttered by a Norwegian.

since you're interested in the topic of antimonies, why not check out the Wikipedia entry, which discusses Kant's antimonies. as 'antimony' is understood in the Kantian sense, the Epimenides ...[text shortened]... ity of an infinite past, so there's a serendipitous tie-in to your 'bookends' thread.
My impression from the profile was that Nordlys is Norwegian.

Thanks for the follow-on reference. Sounds like advanced stuff.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
My impression from the profile was that Nordlys is Norwegian.

Thanks for the follow-on reference. Sounds like advanced stuff.
i'm not denying that Nordlys is Norwegian. I just used the phrase 'a Norwegian' rather than 'Nordlys' to make it watertight, as there is room for doubt, this being the internet.

yw.

Vote Up
Vote Down

How about Russel's antinomy. In intuitive set theory (meanwhile solved with more precise definitions), when you define a set with as elements all sets that do not have themselves as an element, should this new set contain itself as an element or not?

A more day-to-day example would be this: every library has an index (list of works). Some of them record themselves, others don't. Now if you create a library of all indexes that do not refer to themselves, should this library refer to itself in ithe index?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Iron Monkey
sure, but #1 refers to Cretans. of course, you can specify

#1' "All Norwgeians are liars", which would be an example of the paradox if uttered by a Norwegian.

since you're interested in the topic of antimonies, why not check out the Wikipedia entry, which discusses Kant's antimonies. as 'antimony' is understood in the Kantian sense, the Epimenides ...[text shortened]... ity of an infinite past, so there's a serendipitous tie-in to your 'bookends' thread.
With respect to Kant, always seemed curious that the best and
brightest of The Age of Enlightenment all began earnestly
and objectively searching for absolute truth... and then each one
returned by different subjective routes to make an issue of himself.

Taking a full 180 slant, Sam Coleridge (English poet, critic and
theologian 1772-1834) wrote, "He who begins by loving Christianity
better than truth, will proceed by loving his own sect or church
better than Christianity, and end by loving himself better than all."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
My impression from the profile was that Nordlys is Norwegian.
Your impression was wrong. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Your impression was wrong. 😉
Apologies for the assumption.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
If Nordlys wrote, "All Norwegians are liars", believe the sentence

would deliver an identical self-contradictory/paradoxical punch.
My nationality aside, I wouldn't normally use the word "liar" to mean "someone who is lying every single time". So a liar could say "all people of my nationality are liars" without lying (if they really are). Of course more likely xe would be lying, in which case the statement would be wrong, but not paradoxical either (it's wrong that they are all liars, but xe didn't say anything specifically about xymself).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Apologies for the assumption.
You could assume worse things than that. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down