Originally posted by PalynkaI neversaid football was away from the middle road I said the banal polaric statement of going from towns to mudhuts was...But if you'd like me to to elabotrate I think football is far away form humanities emancipation from archaic forms of competition, which is basically what football and its tribe like followers are archaic....and if you don't like my threads/posts why reply to them ?!
The assumptions underlying all your threads are so pathetic that it is the best way to prove you wrong.
Now answer the question.
Originally posted by Vladamir no1And before you say it, yes competition is intrinic to biological life and evolution as Spencer stated 'the survival of the fittest'... But as Rousseau fomulated humainty has moved from a state of nature to a state of culture/civilization....So do we need archaic forms of competition , maybe according to Freudian maxims that say they're necessary to quench the thirst of our suppressed primal urges, they are.. But aren't we suppossed to moving on, I mean really look at football or soccer as you call it, its archaic full of different coloured clans fighting each other and singing stupid songs and overpaid primadonna's please...An anthropologist from another planet would find it quite amazing in a very banl way
I neversaid football was away from the middle road I said the banal polaric statement of going from towns to mudhuts was...But if you'd like me to to elabotrate I think football is far away form humanities emancipation from archaic forms of competition, which is basically what football and its tribe like followers are archaic....and if you don't like my threads/posts why reply to them ?!
Originally posted by Vladamir no1You said that, but it then becomes clear that football is on the other side of the road for you (and therefore not in the middle) since it is also not acceptable.
I neversaid football was away from the middle road I said the banal polaric statement of going from towns to mudhuts was...
And, yes, I would love to hear your elaboration. At least there would be something with substance which will be an interesting variation from the usual linear reasoning backed up by random assumptions that you have displayed so far.
Originally posted by PalynkaRead the post above you ... tut tut you're so unobservant
You said that, but it then becomes clear that football is on the other side of the road for you (and therefore not in the middle) since it is also not acceptable.
And, yes, I would love to hear your elaboration. At least there would be something with substance which will be an interesting variation from the usual linear reasoning backed up by random assumptions that you have displayed so far.
Originally posted by Palynkahere you go I'll make it easy for you I've copied and pasted it for you , I'm off now and I rest my case, find someone in yourclassto debate with, to use a football analogy, I'm way out of your league:
You said that, but it then becomes clear that football is on the other side of the road for you (and therefore not in the middle) since it is also not acceptable.
And, yes, I would love to hear your elaboration. At least there would be something with substance which will be an interesting variation from the usual linear reasoning backed up by random assumptions that you have displayed so far.
And before you say it, yes competition is intrinic to biological life and evolution as Spencer stated 'the survival of the fittest'... But as Rousseau fomulated humainty has moved from a state of nature to a state of culture/civilization....So do we need archaic forms of competition , maybe according to Freudian maxims that say they're necessary to quench the thirst of our suppressed primal urges, they are.. But aren't we suppossed to moving on, I mean really look at football or soccer as you call it, its archaic full of different coloured clans fighting each other and singing stupid songs and overpaid primadonna's please...An anthropologist from another planet would find it quite amazing in a very banl way
1 edit
Originally posted by Vladamir no1Do you understand the concept of entertainment? Because this is what it is all about: entertainment.
And before you say it, yes competition is intrinic to biological life and evolution as Spencer stated 'the survival of the fittest'... But as Rousseau fomulated humainty has moved from a state of nature to a state of culture/civilization....So do we need archaic forms of competition , maybe according to Freudian maxims that say they're necessary to quen ease...An anthropologist from another planet would find it quite amazing in a very banl way
The world cup has little to do with survival of the fittest or primal urges for competition. You've chosen a wrong target there, vlady, because if you are ever lucky enough to be at such a sports event you would realize the amazing atmosphere and the party mood among the vast majority of the fans. In that perspective, you might have a point in club football, but whereas to the world cup, you are just talking about what you don't know and can never know from sitting in that armchair with a look of contempt against all those uncivilized clan-like people singing songs and having fun.
I find you simply pathetic with your armchair psychology.
edit: And from the look of all those posts above you really need to learn how to calm down and wait for an answer.
Originally posted by PalynkaSo you're saying I should be more phenomenological or ethnographic before conceptualising my thoughts? Oh its 'dictionary.com'
Do you understand the concept of entertainment? Because this is what it is all about: entertainment.
The world cup has little to do with survival of the fittest or primal urges for competition. You've chosen a wrong target there, vlady, because if you are ever lucky enough to be at such a sports event you would realize the amazing atmosphere and the part ...[text shortened]... ple singing songs and having fun.
I find you simply pathetic with your armchair psychology.
You're just a cave man football fan who cant take any criticism about his precious little game for overpaid primadonna's
Originally posted by Vladamir no1Oh dear... I'm saying you're misrepresenting the world cup so badly, that your views can never be accurate.
So you're saying I should be more phenomenological or ethnographic before conceptualising my thoughts? Oh its 'dictionary.com'
You're just a cave man football fan who cant take any criticism about his precious little game for overpaid primadonna's
You're just a cave man football fan who cant take any criticism about his precious little game for overpaid primadonna's
This proves exactly my remarks about you in the previous post. Thank you for revealing it so clearly, at least you are honest about it.