Originally posted by PonderableIt wasn't the people here at RHP talking... it was the user removed feeding back who said RHP had no right to make these claims and said it was wrong to post names claiming they broke rules.
please elaborate
Russ saved himself some hassle by just removing the list.
This is my opinion, but that seems to be what happened more than us active users talking about the list.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23319
Originally posted by Phlabibitwell i presume that every user who is banned is told why so i really don't see how removing the list stops people complaining about the fact that they were banned, if anything it raises more questions like this thread as to why someone was banned.
It wasn't the people here at RHP talking... it was the user removed feeding back who said RHP had no right to make these claims and said it was wrong to post names claiming they broke rules.
Russ saved himself some hassle by just removing the list.
This is my opinion, but that seems to be what happened more than us active users talking about the list.
Originally posted by trev33Name one person banned who admits they did wrong.
well i presume that every user who is banned is told why so i really don't see how removing the list stops people complaining about the fact that they were banned, if anything it raises more questions like this thread as to why someone was banned.
NAME ONE!
Originally posted by trev33I believe Phlabs was talking about the banned user complaining about the banned list it self, which is no longer there. At least that is what I got from what he said.
well i presume that every user who is banned is told why so i really don't see how removing the list stops people complaining about the fact that they were banned, if anything it raises more questions like this thread as to why someone was banned.