Originally posted by jimslyp69official announcement retort.....
Does anyone remember when Bowmann threatened to defect over to GK? He came in here and started telling everyone how great it was. He pointed out that at GK :
It was free to join.
Non subs could start an unlimited amount of games.
Non subs could also join tournaments etc.
Well I have just been over there and all this is true I think. One thing non subs ...[text shortened]...
Platinum $59.50 / year ...............100
Titanium $99.50 / year ...............200
Originally posted by rbmorrisI subscribe to both only because gameknot has a holiday postponement facility, because RHP does not I don't play in tournaments here anymore, playing on GK enables me to still take holidays (RHP2006 tournament being an exception). I have to say IMO RHP is superior in every way apart from the lack of a holiday postponement facility.
Yeah, I play on gameknot because a friend started a clan (or whatever gameknot calls them) and asked me to join. A couple of the features like "conditional moves" sounded great at first, but I hardly ever use them. It also runs slower than RHP and has a less intuitive interface. All in all, I'm not a big fan.
Edit: Ok Russ, I said what you told me to say. Now can I have my free membership?
Just kidding.
Originally posted by stevetoddhttp://www.timeforchess.com/board/showthread.php?threadid=48238&page=1#post_863149
I subscribe to both only because gameknot has a holiday postponement facility, because RHP does not I don't play in tournaments here anymore, playing on GK enables me to still take holidays (RHP2006 tournament being an exception). I have to say IMO RHP is superior in every way apart from the lack of a holiday postponement facility.