Clairvoyance
"Simple Definition of clairvoyance:
1. an ability to communicate with dead people, to predict future events,
or to know about things that you did not actually see happen or hear about.
Full Definition of clairvoyance:
1. the power or faculty of discerning objects not present to the senses
2. ability to perceive matters beyond the range of ordinary perception...":
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/clairvoyance
_______________________
Note: Recently the possibility of this clairvoyance phenomena has become of interest.
I'd welcome your own observations and/or experiences.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyHang on sir, is that the plan? Kill me off in the Epitaph thread so that you can commune with me in this one? 😲
[b]Clairvoyance
"Simple Definition of clairvoyance:
1. an ability to communicate with dead people, to predict future events,
or to know about things that you did not actually see happen or hear about.
Full Definition of clairvoyance:
1. the power or faculty of discerning objects not present to the senses
2. ability to perceive matter ...[text shortened]... oyance phenomena has become of interest.
I'd welcome your own observations and/or experiences.[/b]
(You might find the life of Arthur Conan Doyle interesting, in regards to clairvoyance).
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhy is it of interest to you?
[b]Clairvoyance
"Simple Definition of clairvoyance:
1. an ability to communicate with dead people, to predict future events,
or to know about things that you did not actually see happen or hear about.
Full Definition of clairvoyance:
1. the power or faculty of discerning objects not present to the senses
2. ability to perceive matter ...[text shortened]... oyance phenomena has become of interest.
I'd welcome your own observations and/or experiences.[/b]
Is this something to do with your "Kindred Spirits"?
Do you perhaps think you are becoming clairvoyant?
Be good to hear where you are coming from with this...
“Now (obviously) a sentence’s truth—even when we hold the sentence’s meaning fixed—depends on which world we are considering. “Brown is Prime Minister” is true in the actual world but, since Brown need not have been Prime Minister, there are countless worlds in which “Brown is Prime Minister” is false: in those worlds, Brown did not succeed Tony Blair, or never went into politics, or never even existed. And in some other worlds, someone else is Prime Minister — David Cameron, P. F. Strawson, me, Madonna, or Daffy Duck. In still others, there is no such office as Prime Minister, or not even a Britain; and so on and so forth. So a given sentence or proposition varies its truth-value from world to world.” (italics mine) ―William G. Lycan, Philosophy of Language
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyPlease adhere to the thread topic.
“Now (obviously) a sentence’s truth—even when we hold the sentence’s meaning fixed—depends on which world we are considering. “Brown is Prime Minister” is true in the actual world but, since Brown need not have been Prime Minister, there are countless worlds in which “Brown is Prime Minister” is false: in those worlds, Brown did not succeed Tony ...[text shortened]... s truth-value from world to world.”[/i] (italics mine) ―William G. Lycan, Philosophy of Language
Thank you.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyHave you any comment of your own to make?
“Now (obviously) a sentence’s truth—even when we hold the sentence’s meaning fixed—depends on which world we are considering. “Brown is Prime Minister” is true in the actual world but, since Brown need not have been Prime Minister, there are countless worlds in which “Brown is Prime Minister” is false: in those worlds, Brown did not succeed Tony ...[text shortened]... s truth-value from world to world.”[/i] (italics mine) ―William G. Lycan, Philosophy of Language
On anything you post...!
