Originally posted by mtthwI'd love for Cricket and MLB to 'want' to prove this... as it's all conjecture to us for now.
Have you seen a leg-spinner turn a ball through about 30 degrees? Or a googly (looks the same, turns the other way). Or an inswinger suddenly jag away from the batsman? Or a fast bowler on a wearing pitch who can bowl two identical looking balls, except one bounces about two feet higher?
They're both bloody difficult once you've got a good pitcher/bowler ...[text shortened]... I'll leave that to others 🙂). But I'm not going to accept it's easier in a hurry either!
But I'll tell you right now I'd love to have padding on and a face mask when I face any pitcher, and a big fat paddle rather than an MLB bat.
P-
Originally posted by ElleEffSeeeWhen you quote wikipedia as a source to support your debating points, you belittle yourself and your opponent.
Happy reading:
1. http://in.rediff.com/cricket/2006/mar/07cinter.htm
2. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_cricket_team
In the first half century or so these contests were generally friendly but competitive with both sides enjoying the visit to another country, and getting to play against quality cricketers. The famous Bodyline seri ...[text shortened]... he Laws in 2000 only permits six ball overs.
There's a lot more but it's dinner time 🙂
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveThat is just too funny. I would love it if the forums would stay on this level.
The big difference between baseball and cricket is that any-old person can play baseball and probably do all right - whereas to play cricket and do well needs hard work, training and talent.
End of story - case proved!!!
But no, someone comes in deadly serious; yelling and ranting and calling you names for making such an outlandish statement. Then, you respond in kind and someone else comes along making erudite arguments attacking whatever hyperbolic response you made to guy number 1 and the damn thing goes round and round until you want to stick a fork in your eye.
Originally posted by PhlabibitPhlabby, do you think any baseball player can stand at the plate facing 200 consecutive pitches, running to first base (and back sometimes if he doesn't hit a home run), without getting one strike? Also, he can't just hit them indiscriminately, because if he's caught - he's out.
I'd like to see a cricket batter take his gear off and stand in the box as a 94 MPH ball whizzes by his chin for a ball. My guess is he's not going to handle the next curve at his face going in for a strike... or the next high-fastball... or that sinker that will leave him sitting there with 3 called strikes.
This is why criketers have armor and canoe paddles.