Cutting down on games

I'm cutting down on games, please hole all challeges untill I get below 50 games going.

Thanks,
-Adam

Originally posted by UncleAdam
I'm cutting down on games, please hole all challeges untill I get below 50 games going.

Thanks,
-Adam

In your settings area you can set the maximum number of games you can be playing, and if you have more than this no one can challenge you. That's probably your best bet.

-mike

Originally posted by legionnaire
In your settings area you can set the maximum number of games you can be playing, and if you have more than this no one can challenge you. That's probably your best bet.

-mike

that reminds me of the time when i asked someone for a rematch. He explained to me that the reason why no one was challanging me was probably due to the fact that only people above 1700(or was it 1900?) would be able to...woops!😳

Originally posted by rossroe
that reminds me of the time when i asked someone for a rematch. He explained to me that the reason why no one was challanging me was probably due to the fact that only people above 1700(or was it 1900?) would be able to...woops!😳

Originally posted by UncleAdam
I'm cutting down on games, please hole all challeges untill I get below 50 games going.

Thanks,
-Adam

Over at IYT, they are limiting number of moves to 25 per day for non members.

I know RHP now only allows 6 games for non members in an effort to save on bandwidth. However, surely the move limit rule is a better method to achieve this? I mean, you could be playing one person all day and still be eating alot of bandwidth on RHP.

Personally I would prefer to have say 25 games on the go and a restricted number of moves per day. At least this way I think it may be more conducive to ensure all your moves 'count'. Perhaps spending a little more time over each game, (and more analysis when not able to move) may produce better quality games?

What do you think?