Originally posted by Grampy BobbyIf you can't understand English, we might try Afrikaans or Dutch, but I fear we might never be able to communicate if you read things in my posts that were never there...
Speaking to you eyeball to eyeball, as a fellow subscribing member. Why would you feel the need to invoke your official moderator status?
Originally posted by wormwoodI have many pics of her stored away.
hear hear!
luckily we have picys. of darv too.
Darv was the guy who got me interested enough in RHP to subscribe, that was 5 or 6 years ago and in all that time I've only met him once. I hope that his dismissal from here will not signify the end of my chances to meet him again.
I also loved his cigar smoking, hipster jeans wearing, fat Canasian ass.
1 edit
Originally posted by CrowleyRacism is ugly and exists in virtually all areas of the world. Superiority biases and hatreds based on ancestral differences are generalized and target
Racism is definitely MUCH worse than using a second account to post a few posts in the forums, don't you think?
Or would you disagree, hmmm?
groups. Multiple account TOS Violations attack the integrity of the Red Hot Pawn internet site itself. Your "MUCH worse" comparison seems simplistic.
interesting that everyone thinks he was banned for having 2 accounts. He was a paying subscriber, I doubt Chris or Russ would be interested in losing both sources of income. Perhaps there is more to this than meetes the eye
Clan 24646
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyGramps, man, you know we have some sort of pact no aggression. It's cool, maybe it's because we're nothing but two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl... or heaven knows what.
Racism is ugly and exists in virtually all areas of the world. Superiority biases and hatreds based on ancestral differences are generalized and target
groups. Multiple account TOS Violations attack the integrity of the Red Hot Pawn internet site itself. Your "MUCH worse" comparison seems simplistic.
The point is, I will say this with no poison at all, honestly: I do not see in the near future a United Nations Commission on Multiple Accounts in Chess Sites.
If you know what I mean.
Originally posted by Seitsemultiple accounts are a form of fraud, most countries have laws against it, the UN need not get involved😛
Gramps, man, you know we have some sort of pact no aggression. It's cool, maybe it's because we're nothing but two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl... or heaven knows what.
The point is, I will say this with no poison at all, honestly: I do not see in the near future a United Nations Commission on Multiple Accounts in Chess Sites.
If you know what I mean.
1 edit
Originally posted by SeitseThanks, Seitse, and I grasp your point which deals with the larger global issues. Crowley asked for opinions. Gave him mine regarding RHP.
Gramps, man, you know we have some sort of pact no aggression. It's cool, maybe it's because we're nothing but two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl... or heaven knows what.
The point is, I will say this with no poison at all, honestly: I do not see in the near future a United Nations Commission on Multiple Accounts in Chess Sites.
If you know what I mean.
1 edit
Originally posted by Raven69Issue is one of principle. We all agreed to contractual terms of service at the outset. One bends the rules today, two tomorrow... Kiss RHP good by.
I think it depends on what the second account was used for. If it is just to make a few harmless posts than it probably isn't that big of a deal...
Originally posted by duecernope. it was the second account he made some time ago...
interesting that everyone thinks he was banned for having 2 accounts. He was a paying subscriber, I doubt Chris or Russ would be interested in losing both sources of income. Perhaps there is more to this than meetes the eye
Clan 24646
The post that was quoted here has been removedI don't recall joining TSM to take the moral high ground, nor have I ever presented myself as such. Our slogan, "we are who we are", I thought, was a representation of individualism. Of course, that's just my perspective on it. I'm sure the rest of the members have their own take on things, and can speak for themselves. We don't need you to do that for us.
Again, your narrow mind blinds your sight.