Go back
Death at the bottom of the ocean

Death at the bottom of the ocean

General

2 edits

I say fools and their money go their separate ways quickly. Word was out before they even left that the submersible could be unsafe. From what I hear the guy who said that was fired. They knew in advance they were taking a very big chance with their lives. I say condolences to their families though. I am sure they didn't know about the dangers involved in this experimental submersible. I believe it was suicide mission from the start.

OceanGate Was Warned of Potential for ‘Catastrophic’ Problems With Titanic Mission
Experts inside and outside the company warned of potential dangers and urged the company to undergo a certification process.

-VR


I made a submersible craft from an old portapotty. Imma selling tickets to visit the bottom of the Poudre for only 100K
Message me

1 edit


@very-rusty said
I say fools and their money go their separate ways quickly. Word was out before they even left that the submersible could be unsafe. From what I hear the guy who said that was fired. They knew in advance they were taking a very big chance with their lives. I say condolences to their families though. I am sure they didn't know about the dangers involved in this experimental ...[text shortened]... company warned of potential dangers and urged the company to undergo a certification process.

-VR
Absolutely. Which is why, although foolhardy, I have the greatest respect for these brave adventurers.


@fmf said
Yes, I am. The owner of the sub was a charlatan. I take it you didn't bother to watch the video.

It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest they were "pushing out the frontiers of human knowledge”.

I asked but you didn't answer. What new thing were they hoping to discover?
If you really believe this then you are a greater fool than I first thought. They knew the dangers. They were intimately aware of the structural weakness of the carbon fibre hull. But, despite this, they wanted to be pioneers in deep sea science. Don’t make cheap jibes at their expense.

1 edit

@pianoman1 said
If you really believe this then you are a greater fool than I first thought. They knew the dangers. They were intimately aware of the structural weakness of the carbon fibre hull. But, despite this, they wanted to be pioneers in deep sea science. Don’t make cheap jibes at their expense.
'They were intimately aware of the structural weakness of the carbon fibre hull.'
You really think that?
The CEO of the sub company thought it was super strong.
Do you think they would have jumped out of an airplane if they were 'intimately aware' their parachute was made of tissue paper?

1 edit

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down


@pianoman1 said
If you really believe this then you are a greater fool than I first thought.
I am NOT a fool!

1 edit

@pianoman1 said
But, despite this, they wanted to be pioneers in deep sea science.
Pioneers? What new thing in "deep sea science" were they seeking to discover? Hadn't "deep sea scientists" already told them the sub was a death trap based on "scientific knowledge" about the "deep sea"?


@pianoman1 said
Do not ever underestimate the men who push the bounds of scientific knowledge to the limit. Only by pushing can we progress in our knowledge and understanding of the human condition.
Haven't hundreds of people already visited the wreck in the last 38 years? How is someone doing it in 2023 "pushing the bounds of scientific knowledge to the limit"?


@pianoman1 said
If you really believe this then you are a greater fool than I first thought. They knew the dangers. They were intimately aware of the structural weakness of the carbon fibre hull. But, despite this, they wanted to be pioneers in deep sea science. Don’t make cheap jibes at their expense.
It's a serious matter.. it was trans submarine. They should know it was not real


@fmf said
Haven't hundreds of people already visited the wreck in the last 38 years? How is someone doing it in 2023 "pushing the bounds of scientific knowledge to the limit"?
Didnt James Cameron and a crew go down there dozens of times while filming the movie? The problem was the actual submarine. It as a prototype. People suggested they should have tested it our on poorer people first so that the media would not get involved.


@fmf said
I am NOT a fool!
Prove it by staying within the Site Guidelines. 🙂

-VR

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.