Go back
Doesn't it suck for artists . . .

Doesn't it suck for artists . . .

General


@Torunn said
People buy work of art for different reasons. Not because of its value on the market but because you like it and want it. I was given paintings by my art-loving father - not his own work but pieces he bought on different occasions without having the need for them. He gave them to me - oil paintings, water colour, lithography - and I love them too. My family though I believe do not feel the same way. πŸ™‚
So like I told Stees who ever you leave them too if they are of any value the will in all likely hood sell.

-VR

3 edits

@Very-Rusty said
So like I told Stees who ever you leave them too if they are of any value the will in all likely hood sell.

-VR
There is so much art being made today, in different ways. If you want art that grows in value you must either invest a lot of money, or be very lucky to inherit, or find unknown but valuable pieces at auctions. πŸ™‚

... or in your attic if perhaps you have helped a poor painter with food and shelter in return for paintings, and it turns out that the person was very talented indeed. It may still happen.


@Very-Rusty said
The paintings are always worth more after the artist is deceased!

-VR
Well then, maybe they should die first and paint later, eh? Would be a lot more lucrative.

1 edit

@Torunn said
There is so much art being made today, in different ways. If you want art that grows in value you must either invest a lot of money, or be very lucky to inherit, or find unknown but valuable pieces at auctions. πŸ™‚

... or in your attic if perhaps you have helped a poor painter with food and shelter in return for paintings, and it turns out that the person was very talented indeed. It may still happen.
I guess one could also become chairman of the Kennedy Center.

I know, Performing Arts, but hey, art is art. πŸ™‚


@Great-Big-Stees said
I have a couple if signed and numbered prints by a Canadian artist that have gone up in value since I purchased them and that artist is still “among” us @ 95.πŸ‘
Aren't prints just copies? Like lithographs, maybe?

I mean the price does go up if they are good copies, but still.


@Great-Big-Stees said
No, you misunderstand. I buy art pieces because I like to look at them. If they increase in value that is just how the market “might” go. Yes I will likely leave them to my family, who like me, enjoy looking at them and more than likely would do as I did…pass them on. Now should they decide to sell them, so be it. I got out of them what I wanted.πŸ‘
This is why prints are great. I have several prints in my house of Bev Doolittle paintings. Cheaper than the originals, but they are still good to look at.


@Suzianne said
This is why prints are great. I have several prints in my house of Bev Doolittle paintings. Cheaper than the originals, but they are still good to look at.
Leaving all the bougie armchair art-appraisers aside, I think your and Stees' posts (and maybe some others) indicate that art might help after all, even despite other countervailing influences.

1 edit

@Great-Big-Stees said
I have a couple if signed and numbered prints by a Canadian artist that have gone up in value since I purchased them and that artist is still “among” us @ 95.πŸ‘
Aha, Signed and numbered. I missed this the first time around.

These do have greater value.

The Bev Doolittle I have over my desk says 12460/20000.

I wouldn't want to have to sign that many. My hand would be on ice for a week.


Of course with the OP I meant something more along the lines of helping to nudge our shared world in better directions, but it seems I was a stupid fool to even have such a notion.


@Suzianne said
Aha, Signed and numbered. I missed this the first time around.

These do have greater value.

The Bev Doolittle I have over my desk says 12460/20000.

I wouldn't want to have to sign that many. My hand would be on ice for a week.
I have learned that with the techniques they use today, it doesn't matter if the lito you have is the first or last print of a series, the signature may though.


@Torunn said
I have learned that with the techniques they use today, it doesn't matter if the lito you have is the first or last print of a series, the signature may though.
Very good point!


@Arkturos said
Of course with the OP I meant something more along the lines of helping to nudge our shared world in better directions, but it seems I was a stupid fool to even have such a notion.
Good art, be it paintings, or music, or stage performance, is bliss.

We can consume it continuously, at our leisure, making it endlessly nurturing.


@Suzianne said
Very good point!
I have also learned from experience that the place you choose for the picture is equally important, I am very particular about that. So when all pictures have found their right place in my home, they 'bond' and stay together. πŸ™‚


@Torunn said
I have also learned from experience that the place you choose for the picture is equally important, I am very particular about that. So when all pictures have found their right place in my home, they 'bond' and stay together. πŸ™‚
Much like some friendships.πŸ€”πŸ‘πŸ˜


@Suzianne said
Aha, Signed and numbered. I missed this the first time around.

These do have greater value.

The Bev Doolittle I have over my desk says 12460/20000.

I wouldn't want to have to sign that many. My hand would be on ice for a week.
I have several signed and numbered prints by different artists, some well known others not so but the largest “run” had, compared to yours a paltry number, of 850. I wonder how long it would take to sign ✍️ 20,000?πŸ€”πŸ˜²