Dodger11 had posted something akin to the every person in the Middle East was a bunch of tribal centerized savages and that it was the fault of the Islamic religion that they were a thousand years behind such enlightened thinkers has Dodger11 (if my synopsis is deemed to be unfair please post his EXACT statement, Mods). In response, I wrote:
Because you are an ignorant, ethocentric racist. Spew your trash on the KKK web site where it would be more welcome.
In the name of RHP fairness, my response to a racist, bigoted thread was deleted to be presumably fair to the racists and bigots out there. As I am unclear on the policy now, will someone in authority please specify that responses to bigots will now be moderated because they are flamming bigots or have I missed something?
Originally posted by no1marauderI do not have access to the original post of yours, however:
Dodger11 had posted something akin to the every person in the Middle East was a bunch of tribal centerized savages and that it was the fault of the Islamic religion that they were a thousand years behind such enlightened thinkers has Dodger11 (if my synopsis is deemed to be unfair please post his EXACT statement, Mods). In response, I wrote:
...[text shortened]... ses to bigots will now be moderated because they are flamming bigots or have I missed something?
1) Threads (posts) are moderated based on what the moderator deems unacceptable.
2) The moderators do not need to justify themselves.
Having said that, I would have to conclude that the moderators find the views of Dodger11 acceptable, and find your "exposing" of him as a racist pig, unacceptable.
Go figure....
(and, with apologies to 'borrowing' your trademark)
Yours Initsacryingshameship
alcra
Originally posted by no1marauderI too have had responses to Dodger11's comments modded.
Dodger11 had posted something akin to the every person in the Middle East was a bunch of tribal centerized savages and that it was the fault of the Islamic religion that they were a thousand years behind such enlightened thinkers has Dodger11 (if my synopsis is deemed to be unfair please post his EXACT statement, Mods). In response, I wrote:
...[text shortened]... ses to bigots will now be moderated because they are flamming bigots or have I missed something?
Originally posted by no1marauderWhere is Dodger11's post?
Dodger11 had posted something akin to the every person in the Middle East was a bunch of tribal centerized savages and that it was the fault of the Islamic religion that they were a thousand years behind such enlightened thinkers has Dodger11 (if my synopsis is deemed to be unfair please post his EXACT statement, Mods). In response, I wrote:
...[text shortened]... ses to bigots will now be moderated because they are flamming bigots or have I missed something?
Originally posted by VargYep......Marauder's tellin' tales again, misquoting and such. I thought my post was quite conservative in it's analysis. Not to mention 100% true and right on the mark.
OK. Well, MarauderNo1's synopsis is way off the mark and misleading. Go read it for yourselves.
I think Dodger's original 'dodgy' remark has gone as well.
I remember seeing a comment fitting No1's description, but it doesn't seem to be there anymore.
Is there a policy statemtent of what's to be removed? I'd expect racism should be high on the list of what's not tolerated.
We shouldn't give these scum a platform for their ideas.
Originally posted by RedmikePost, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable
I think Dodger's original 'dodgy' remark has gone as well.
I remember seeing a comment fitting No1's description, but it doesn't seem to be there anymore.
Is there a policy statemtent of what's to be removed? I'd expect racism should be high on the list of what's not tolerated.
We shouldn't give these scum a platform for their ideas.
Seems it's in the list of bad things.
Originally posted by XanthosNZOK, can any of the moderators explain why those racist posts are still there?
Post, email or otherwise make available any Content that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable
Seems it's in the list of bad things.
Originally posted by RedmikeWell that probably explains why Marauder's reply was deleted, if the original post was, too. Duh! 🙄
I think Dodger's original 'dodgy' remark has gone as well.
I remember seeing a comment fitting No1's description, but it doesn't seem to be there anymore.
Is there a policy statemtent of what's to be removed? I'd expect racism should be high on the list of what's not tolerated.
We shouldn't give these scum a platform for their ideas.
Originally posted by VargSo an outraged response to a racist, bigoted post is just as bad as the racist, bigoted post? DUH! Yes, his original post was deleted, but why should mine be? Is it "flamming" someone who makes an ignorant bigoted post to call them an ignorant bigot? And if you want to take the word of Dodger11 over mine go ahead; I again invite the Mods to re-post Dodger11's original remarks and we'll see who the liar is.
Well that probably explains why Marauder's reply was deleted, if the original post was, too. Duh! 🙄