09 Feb 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat generalisation? I said that just because it's true for you, it doesn't have to be true for everybody else, so it's rather a de-generalisation.
Not quite. Sexist is sexist. Ageist is ageist. No different than many other forms of better than thou bigotry. Your generalization disappoints me.
09 Feb 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThat was a question to you. You added "5. Ageist posters" to the list of sexist posters, so it sounds like you believe all ageist posters to be sexist. Why else would you put them in a list of sexist posters?
Lady Nordlys, seems you've conveniently (or selectively) forgotten or dismissed the lead in sentence of your post. Intellectual honesty matters.
09 Feb 09
2 edits
Originally posted by Nordlys#5 to go beyond 'sexist' to include an equally egregious display of unjustified/inexcusable self serving bigotry/and invalid discrimination.
That was a question to you. You added "5. Ageist posters" to the list of sexist posters, so it sounds like you believe all ageist posters to be sexist. Why else would you put them in a list of sexist posters?
Edit: Just to head you off at the pass... 'invalid' in view of the fact that we all practice legitimate discrimination every day. We pick and choose.
10 Feb 09
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyBump for Nordlys.
#5 to go beyond 'sexist' to include an equally egregious display of unjustified/inexcusable self serving bigotry/and invalid discrimination.
Edit: Just to head you off at the pass... 'invalid' in view of the fact that we all practice legitimate discrimination every day. We pick and choose.