24 Feb 09
For non-subs, sometimes a screen pops up telling you in order to get rid of "annoying advertisements", you need to pay the subscription fee.
Question: If i were one of the companies that pay RHP to advertise, how would I feel if the site owners characteize my ads as "annoying"
Surely, there is something inherently wrong about this.
24 Feb 09
Originally posted by uzlessRuss has nothing to worry about. Darv has given his star in and bought it back so many times that the site can run income free for ten years.
For non-subs, sometimes a screen pops up telling you in order to get rid of "annoying advertisements", you need to pay the subscription fee.
Question: If i were one of the companies that pay RHP to advertise, how would I feel if the site owners characteize my ads as "annoying"
Surely, there is something inherently wrong about this.
24 Feb 09
Originally posted by uzlessAdvertisers know that advertisments in general are annoying, especially those of their competitors.
For non-subs, sometimes a screen pops up telling you in order to get rid of "annoying advertisements", you need to pay the subscription fee.
Question: If i were one of the companies that pay RHP to advertise, how would I feel if the site owners characteize my ads as "annoying"
Surely, there is something inherently wrong about this.
Of course Russ can't write "When you pay you lose all that intersting and funny advertisments". But he could offer the option to see the adverts anyway 🙂