Go back
fyi

fyi

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Hey now, just because you never admit you were wrong doesn't mean you were NOT wrong.

P-
Ok if I am right 99.9% of the time obviously I am admitting to being wrong too. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Ok if I am right 99.9% of the time obviously I am admitting to being wrong too. 😉
Admit it's more like 19.9% and you're still exaggerating... but it's a step in the right direction.

P-

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Admit it's more like 19.9% and you're still exaggerating... but it's a step in the right direction.

P-
I'll go 99% but no lower. 😉

I have a reputation to protect here. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty

I have a reputation to protect here. 😛
it's needs little protection, trust me.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
it's needs little protection, trust me.
ATTACK!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
ATTACK!
DUCK>>>>

[i]

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
DUCK>>>>

[i]
My reputation has to be up held here! 😛

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
My reputation has to be up held here! 😛
VR holds his reputation up, and not even William Tell could hit it with an arrow.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
VR holds his reputation up, and not even William Tell could hit it with an arrow.

P-
A Reputation is an important thing indeed. I would sooner be known as the one who said it, as he saw it, rather you liked it or not.

Than to be known as a Buttkisser. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
DUCK>>>>

[i]
quack^^^^^^^^

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by duecer
quack^^^^^^^^
If it looks like a DUCK, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck.

There is a good chance it is a DUCK>>>>

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
Tell them I said "HAI GUYZ"!~

LOLOLO

P-
i did. they said 'who's "Phlab"?'😛

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne


Blackamp's thread was not about clans, per se. It was about his preconceived notion of Christianity that christians should just sit and take it when someone slams them and their beliefs.
my initial claim was that Christians should refrain specifically from trash-talking. the question about just sitting and taking it is slightly more complex. yes i do think that Christian ethics does involve 'turning the other cheek' when struck. on the other hand, non-aggressive defence - say, through rational argument - would seem to be perfectly ok. of course, rational argument in support of a belief in an invisible friend and wafers of bread that magically turn into the flesh of a guy who died years ago and far away has always been a tall order. that hasn't stopped some very great minds from trying tho, and here Paul of Tarsus, Augustine of Hippo, Aquinas, and Kierkegaard deserve special mention.

after all, the promise is that wrongs will be righted in the afterlife - do-gooders rewarded, and evil-doers punished. so the Christian can just chill in the knowledge that their invisible friend will sort things out later.

also, it is the meek who will inherit the Earth, apparently, and the meek don't trash talk by definition.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Not the Mods fault that Blackamp is a Liar.
it does not surprise me in the least that you do not know the difference between lies and satire.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
my 'Trash-talking Christians Clan' thread - a satirical thread about a [b]non-existent (hellooooooo?) clan - got moved to the Clans forum.😵

for those who believe baby Jesus is the son of God, and want to make him cry, you can find it here: Thread 124942.

i'm not sayin', i'm just sayin'.

this post is for informational purposes only. conditions may apply.[/b]
I saw that. You sure tricked them didn't you!

It really should be in Spirituality Forum with posts removed, from what I saw this afternoon.