Originally posted by PalynkaI know what it is you pom-pom
It's called reductio ad absurdum.
Thread 111203
Originally posted by uzlessSo we agree then that your initial question was senseless. Good.
I know what it is you pom-pom
Thread 111203
Originally posted by PalynkaOh my sad sad dear palynka. Once again jumping to conclusions that are just a bridge too far.
So we agree then that your initial question was senseless. Good.
I simply showed I UNDERSTOOD what you were attempting to do.
The difference, of course, is that whereas my question about monkeys to the poster in the other thread was warranted and had merit of point, your question lacked both.
How do you like them apples?
Originally posted by uzlessI have yet to see you present an argument or step up to the challenge that my question posed. By repeating my question, you simply either agree with my reductio or you have no sense of logic. Both end the conversation.
Oh my sad sad dear palynka. Once again jumping to conclusions that are just a bridge too far.
I simply showed I UNDERSTOOD what you were attempting to do.
The difference, of course, is that whereas my question about monkeys to the poster in the other thread was warranted and had merit of point, your question lacked both.
How do you like them apples?