Go back
guess who this is about

guess who this is about

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

surely ironman (if an engine user) has come up against another engine user on many occasions in his 1303 games possibly using the same engine, chessmaster v chessmaster usually one side will win. The thought of beating ironman must have been very tempting for some to use an engine so surely he should have more losses? And by the looks of some of his challenges he takes anybody on.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Centaurs have four legs.

Vote Up
Vote Down

come on how could this cheecky faced chap cheat??????????????

http://www.dogstarr.org.uk/rhpfaces/gallery/gal93.htm

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by leestatic
surely ironman (if an engine user) has come up against another engine user on many occasions in his 1303 games possibly using the same engine, chessmaster v chessmaster usually one side will win. The thought of beating ironman must have been very tempting for some to use an engine so surely he should have more losses? And by the looks of some of his challenges he takes anybody on.
Thats the first time I've seen somebody say that the fact that somebody HASN'T lost to engines, is evidence that they DON'T cheat.

When it comes to engines vs. engines. The one with the bigger processor, better software, better DRIVER and more time spent on each move, is going to win.

--tmetzler

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Centaurs have four legs.
And can sometimes be such an ass.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by tmetzler
Thats the first time I've seen somebody say that the fact that somebody HASN'T lost to engines, is evidence that they DON'T cheat.

When it comes to engines vs. engines. The one with the bigger processor, better software, better DRIVER and more time spent on each move, is going to win.

--tmetzler
And what are the chances of not playing that someone?
he also has 89 games in progress he would never be of his computer.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nyxie
And can sometimes be such an ass.
Centaur is the technical term for an engine and a player working together.

Vote Up
Vote Down

All further questions in this interview will be centaur questions.

If you were a centaur and there was a really hot horse back end sticking out of a barn and you couldn't see the front to tell if it was another centaur or just a horse, would you have sex with it?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Centaur is the technical term for an engine and a player working together.
What?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
Centaur is the technical term for an engine and a player working together.
And matthew hopkins is and old English name.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow
All further questions in this interview will be centaur questions.

If you were a centaur and there was a really hot horse back end sticking out of a barn and you couldn't see the front to tell if it was another centaur or just a horse, would you have sex with it?
Where have I heard this before?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blitz00
Where have I heard this before?
SNL

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nyxie
What?
An engine working together with even middling players has a massive advantage over an engine working alone (or with someone who plays the moves it suggest mindlessly).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
An engine working together with even middling players has a massive advantage over an engine working alone (or with someone who plays the moves it suggest mindlessly).
ok. I've just never heard that term before. I guess my statement can still stand though.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
An engine working together with even middling players has a massive advantage over an engine working alone (or with someone who plays the moves it suggest mindlessly).
So you are saying that somebody with a LOT of chess knowledge using an engine would play even better than a moron using an engine?

Who would have thought that... 🙂

--tmetzler