I hear the betting line is -300 on Holm and +230 on Tate... that's tough.
Holm is clearly better athletically but for -300? idk.
Holm = taller, wide shoulders, narrow hips, thick jaw.... nobody in that division is built like that. The problem is she is older than everyone else and inconsistent fight-to-fight. Her best win is vs a grappler and now is vs a striker.
Originally posted by SPswindlerI bet on Holm by decision andwaslikethisclose but then Holly decided to go for the finish instead of waiting out the last 2 min of round 5. I can't say I blame her. Not fun to be the champion content to win by decision.
I hear the betting line is -300 on Holm and +230 on Tate... that's tough.
Holm is clearly better athletically but for -300? idk.
Holm = taller, wide shoulders, narrow hips, thick jaw.... nobody in that division is built like that. The problem is she is older than everyone else and inconsistent fight-to-fight. Her best win is vs a grappler and now is vs a striker.