This is absoluckingflutely hard to tell. You just have to figure that one
out for yourself.
I have my thoughts on who but I am not going to say anymore on
here. Why? Because if that is what they want to do...then they don't
have a "real" rating here.
I was accused of cheating because I use books in the opening phase
as well as giving me ideas for the middlegame...and lord knows they
halp in the endgame...but this IS the basis of Correspondance Chess.
Programs are not.
There are alot of talented players here...who can win over 200 games
and only lose two? I don't think so. As well as carrying over 30 games
at a time and remaining undefeated...against some of the top
players. I don't think so.
Everyone who has played me knows I play hard...and that if their is a
game that follows our lines I am going to use it...but once it
deviates...I am on my own. And I still play hard...a couple of times...5
to be exact I was crushed...and in the others I squeaked out a draw.
You make you own decisions upon who is cheating...me...I won't play
the ones I think are.
Just my thoughts...but then again...i could be wrong.
Dave