if the muse is in the room you might entitile a forum topic and place a remark.
if there is a reply of merit you might respond.
but do not continue to post for the object is to create the forum post and not "dominate it".
create the avenue...do not walk it.
you allow others to further create or divert the subject.
to dominate the forum is to lay out the blue print and let others build.
@mister-moggy saidHe uses invisible ink when he types. 😉
@moonbus
( the silence is deafening )
You need a special programme to see it.
-VR
@ponderable saidwow...I missed the negation. Shame on me.
@mister-moggy
Could you please tell us the difference to Thread 181096?
@ponderable saidIt is ok, your only human and make mistakes same as the rest of us. 😉
wow...I missed the negation. Shame on me.
-VR
@mister-moggy saidSeems like you succeeded on this one 😉
if the muse is in the room you might entitile a forum topic and place a remark.
if there is a reply of merit you might respond.
but do not continue to post for the object is to create the forum post and not "dominate it".
create the avenue...do not walk it.
you allow others to further create or divert the subject.
to dominate the forum is to lay out the blue print and let others build.
@ponderable saidActually he did make a second comment in it! 😉
Seems like you succeeded on this one 😉
-VR
@mister-moggy saidSo the criteria for Domination could be
to dominate the forum is to lay out the blue print and let others build.
* number of posts (Domination by sheer presence)
* number of "thumb up" (Domination by Quality)
* number of replies (Domination by forcing Response)
* number of created threads (Domination by Guiding)
Right?
Since you claimed not to domintae and in the last sentence of your post you Claim that just laying the foundation of a thread is already a way to dominate. Are you consitsnet in the use of "Domination"?
@ponderable saidKilling threads wouldn't be dominating them would it? That would just be getting in the last word in a thread right.
So the criteria for Domination could be
* number of posts (Domination by sheer presence)
* number of "thumb up" (Domination by Quality)
* number of replies (Domination by forcing Response)
* number of created threads (Domination by Guiding)
Right?
Since you claimed not to domintae and in the last sentence of your post you Claim that just laying the foundation of a thread is already a way to dominate. Are you consitsnet in the use of "Domination"?
-VR
@very-rusty saidyes. And some people kill threads by posting boring posts
Killing threads wouldn't be dominating them would it? That would just be getting in the last word in a thread right.
-VR