1 edit
Originally posted by RavelloIsn't it funny how people like to pick at the nose of misspelt werds?
Oh,now I understand.
Yes,it would be really difficult to see me or Skeet saying something like that,we'd have spelt necrophile right.
By the way I think it's horrible even as an insult,I really can't think of it.
BTW, Misspelt was the Northern Canadian winner at the Inuit
beauty contest last year....
Originally posted by Aikowhich is more funny: spellchecking while insulting, or letting the passion show with an unhinged blurt of barely comprehensible drivel. both bring some funny images to my mind. 🙂
Intended irony?
But true, a real master would have concurred the spelling obstacle. Those big insults are all about the spelling or pronunciation.
"mm.. ah-HA! merriam-webster says 'that word meaning an animal with hooves' has TWO s's instead of three..."
Originally posted by wormwoodI suspect most ungulates would follow your lead with unhinged blurts of barely comprehensible drivel. 😉 Picking up the pieces ~ even just tapping the keys ~ has to very, very, very challenging, though. 😞
which is more funny: spellchecking while insulting, or letting the passion show with an unhinged blurt of barely comprehensible drivel. both bring some funny images to my mind. 🙂
"mm.. ah-HA! merriam-webster says 'that word meaning an animal with hooves' has TWO s's instead of three..."
Originally posted by Moldy CrowImagine you are trying to spell something - something simple like "i-d-i-o.."
How can one agree with a spelling obstacle?
Suddenly someone seizes you by the tongue, preventing you from completing the word. 😉
That person then says: "Will you expose your ignorance, now?" 😀 You have few options. One is most definitely to agree with them, Moldy. That'd be agreeing with a spelling obstacle 😵😵😵😵😵😵😵