19 Jul 05
Ironman31 play woodworm. Had a look at a couple of woodworms games, he's awesome!! Check this out...
Game 652133
or how about this...
Game 371486 (fools mate with a twist!)
I recon it would be a stonking game!
19 Jul 05
Originally posted by marinakatombI think we should force them to . Let's go to site ideas forum and demand gladiatorial chess death matches .
Ironman31 play woodworm. Had a look at a couple of woodworms games, he's awesome!! Check this out...
Game 652133
or how about this...
Game 371486 (fools mate with a twist!)
I recon it would be a stonking game!
19 Jul 05
Originally posted by ark13I have to say that woodworms style is similar to ironmans. He uses tempo to perfection, really impressive. As for ironman, i'm sure most of you have played him and learned that he has this particular technique down to a fine art. The two together would be like the Tal/fischer match that never was! (obviously i'm disregarding the Tal/Fischer match that did happen as Fischer was only 11 at the time!)
Indeed
20 Jul 05
Originally posted by marinakatombhow do you get to play Ironman?
I have to say that woodworms style is similar to ironmans. He uses tempo to perfection, really impressive. As for ironman, i'm sure most of you have played him and learned that he has this particular technique down to a fine art. The two together would be like the Tal/fischer match that never was! (obviously i'm disregarding the Tal/Fischer match that did happen as Fischer was only 11 at the time!)
20 Jul 05
Nice to see woodworm get some recognition. If he played more frequently he'd be near or at the top of the log. It does go to show, though, that the ratings don't only reflect playing strength but also the workload. The reason for that is because there is an ever-increasing rating spread as this site become more mature. If you are a good player, but relatively inactive, your rating is almost certainly lower than it should be compared to more active players.