Go back
I wanted recs (more than 20)

I wanted recs (more than 20)

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Then I realised that thread was closed. Eight people got recs before I realised.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
Then I realised that thread was closed. Eight people got recs before I realised.
So why did you start another one?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
We heard that the fifth, sixth, and twentieth times. And I'm not on it, ass.

I want more recs. Gimme!
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.
You're not quite correct.

The objection was having two threads with the same title in separate forums.

I posted under this thread because of the similar background regarding moderators.

(I don't care much about recs other than pointing out that there seems to be a lot of Americans who agree).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
If this is the best you can come up with then I agree. Your number of recs is very likely to stay at 42. How did you get 42 in the first place? Do you have a second account and give yourself recs?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
If this is the best you can come up with then I agree. Your number of recs is very likely to stay at 42. How did you get 42 in the first place? Do you have a second account and give yourself recs?
No, no second account. I don't cheat, nor do I cheat with recs.

Bloody hell, talk about ... never mind, I have a better idea than to say that. RWingett, sorry for any offence, or misunderstanding on my part, let this thing die. Baaaad joke.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
You're not quite correct.

The objection was having two threads with the same title in separate forums.

I posted under this thread because of the similar background regarding moderators.

(I don't care much about recs other than pointing out that there seems to be a lot of Americans who agree).
Egoist - they weren't even talking to you!

but here's a 3 fresh objections for you:
Please do not post the same text repeatedly.
Please do not hijack threads by posting unrelated messages in them.
Please do not continuously bump your threads back to the top of the list when no one else is posting in them.

Thanks

Jon

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
Egoist - they weren't even talking to you!

but here's a 3 fresh objections for you:
Please do not post the same text repeatedly.
Please do not hijack threads by posting unrelated messages in them.
Please do not continuously bump your threads back to the top of the list when no one else is posting in them.

Thanks

Jon
My mistake as I'd scrolled through after staring at computers all day.

Since when does a moderator have the right to delete posts without adequate warning whilst making public attacks on subscribers ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
My mistake as I'd scrolled through after staring at computers all day.

Since when does a moderator have the right to delete posts without adequate warning whilst making public attacks on subscribers ?
As a moderator I have the job of removing spam, which includes someone posting the exact same text in a dozen different threads.

As a user I have the right to make requests to another user to stop spamming. I did say please 3 times.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
You have 43 recs now. You no longer have the meaning of life. Die pls.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
As a moderator I have the job of removing spam, which includes someone posting the exact same text in a dozen different threads.

As a user I have the right to make requests to another user to stop spamming. I did say please 3 times.

Your focus was on not having threads with the same subject heading in different forums. As a moderator, you shouldn't be attacking other users (subscribers) in public.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
hey Bum, why dont you say somnething worth reading then you may get some more recs