Go back
I wanted recs (more than 20)

I wanted recs (more than 20)

General

D

Brisbane, Australia

Joined
08 Sep 03
Moves
17480
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Then I realised that thread was closed. Eight people got recs before I realised.

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
Then I realised that thread was closed. Eight people got recs before I realised.
So why did you start another one?

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

D

Brisbane, Australia

Joined
08 Sep 03
Moves
17480
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
We heard that the fifth, sixth, and twentieth times. And I'm not on it, ass.

I want more recs. Gimme!
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.

D

Brisbane, Australia

Joined
08 Sep 03
Moves
17480
Clock
05 Jan 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
05 Jan 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
Russ has already stated his disapproval of this tactic and closed the other thread. Why do you persist by opening an identical one?

If you want recs then say something worthwhile.
You're not quite correct.

The objection was having two threads with the same title in separate forums.

I posted under this thread because of the similar background regarding moderators.

(I don't care much about recs other than pointing out that there seems to be a lot of Americans who agree).

rwingett
Ming the Merciless

Royal Oak, MI

Joined
09 Sep 01
Moves
27626
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
If this is the best you can come up with then I agree. Your number of recs is very likely to stay at 42. How did you get 42 in the first place? Do you have a second account and give yourself recs?

D

Brisbane, Australia

Joined
08 Sep 03
Moves
17480
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
If this is the best you can come up with then I agree. Your number of recs is very likely to stay at 42. How did you get 42 in the first place? Do you have a second account and give yourself recs?
No, no second account. I don't cheat, nor do I cheat with recs.

Bloody hell, talk about ... never mind, I have a better idea than to say that. RWingett, sorry for any offence, or misunderstanding on my part, let this thing die. Baaaad joke.

belgianfreak
stitching you up

Joined
08 Apr 02
Moves
7146
Clock
05 Jan 05
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
You're not quite correct.

The objection was having two threads with the same title in separate forums.

I posted under this thread because of the similar background regarding moderators.

(I don't care much about recs other than pointing out that there seems to be a lot of Americans who agree).
Egoist - they weren't even talking to you!

but here's a 3 fresh objections for you:
Please do not post the same text repeatedly.
Please do not hijack threads by posting unrelated messages in them.
Please do not continuously bump your threads back to the top of the list when no one else is posting in them.

Thanks

Jon

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
Egoist - they weren't even talking to you!

but here's a 3 fresh objections for you:
Please do not post the same text repeatedly.
Please do not hijack threads by posting unrelated messages in them.
Please do not continuously bump your threads back to the top of the list when no one else is posting in them.

Thanks

Jon
My mistake as I'd scrolled through after staring at computers all day.

Since when does a moderator have the right to delete posts without adequate warning whilst making public attacks on subscribers ?

belgianfreak
stitching you up

Joined
08 Apr 02
Moves
7146
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by STANG
My mistake as I'd scrolled through after staring at computers all day.

Since when does a moderator have the right to delete posts without adequate warning whilst making public attacks on subscribers ?
As a moderator I have the job of removing spam, which includes someone posting the exact same text in a dozen different threads.

As a user I have the right to make requests to another user to stop spamming. I did say please 3 times.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26753
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
You have 43 recs now. You no longer have the meaning of life. Die pls.

S

Joined
07 May 04
Moves
10805
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by belgianfreak
As a moderator I have the job of removing spam, which includes someone posting the exact same text in a dozen different threads.

As a user I have the right to make requests to another user to stop spamming. I did say please 3 times.

Your focus was on not having threads with the same subject heading in different forums. As a moderator, you shouldn't be attacking other users (subscribers) in public.

B
You Cheeky

Up my own ***

Joined
20 Jul 04
Moves
5247
Clock
05 Jan 05
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by D43M0N
OK, Mr Without-a-sense-of-humour-of-idiocy-of-others...

For the record, I don't give a rat's about Recs. I got 42 recs, and 42 is the meaning of life. So, it shall stay that way.
hey Bum, why dont you say somnething worth reading then you may get some more recs

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.