Go back
I'm Back

I'm Back

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
It would be nice if everyone could get past the back and forth crap.

I am just as quilty as anyone else I suppose. Like the saying goes it takes two to Tango. You need a little controversey to make the forums lively, but you don't want it to get to a point where you have a group against one person.

GB isn't part of the little group, nor am I which d ...[text shortened]... t we should all be able to post and say what we want within reason. Of course within the TOS.
Rusty, i think you have good motives in leaping to GB's defence all the time, but i think you overlook the GB qualities that attract so much criticism. it's not a matter of being in with this or that group - really, it isn't - maybe it was in the past with the whole TSM/PFC thing, but i don't think it is now. rather, GB attracts criticism because he is pompous and arrogant, self-obsessed, continually self-promoting, has a false sense of his own superiority (paradoxically grounded in a deep-seated inferiority complex, i would imagine), sets out deliberately to annoy the forum (take his spamming and latest stupid hidden message obsession for example), tries to control threads and what others post, tries to force his own religious views on the forum, snipes at people in a mealy-mouthed fashion...etc.

in short it is his own anti-social behaviour that gets him (rightly) criticised so much. i think your sympathy for him is misplaced.

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
Rusty, i think you have good motives in leaping to GB's defence all the time, but i think you overlook the GB qualities that attract so much criticism. it's not a matter of being in with this or that group - really, it isn't - maybe it was in the past with the whole TSM/PFC thing, but i don't think it is now. rather, GB attracts criticism because he is pomp ...[text shortened]... iour that gets him (rightly) criticised so much. i think your sympathy for him is misplaced.
"GB attracts criticism because he is pompous and arrogant, self-obsessed, continually self-promoting, has a false sense of his own superiority (paradoxically grounded in a deep-seated inferiority complex, i would imagine), sets out deliberately to annoy the forum (take his spamming and latest stupid hidden message obsession for example), tries to control threads and what others post, tries to force his own religious views on the forum, snipes at people in a mealy-mouthed fashion...etc.

in short it is his own anti-social behaviour that gets him (rightly) criticised so much."


...............


Guilty as charged..,
Shoot if you must this old blond head at the first crack of dawn... and if not, beware. I know where you live and my diminished peepers still see right through your father deprived angst/facade loud and clear.




😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Blackamp
Rusty, i think you have good motives in leaping to GB's defence all the time, but i think you overlook the GB qualities that attract so much criticism. it's not a matter of being in with this or that group - really, it isn't - maybe it was in the past with the whole TSM/PFC thing, but i don't think it is now. rather, GB attracts criticism because he is pomp ...[text shortened]... iour that gets him (rightly) criticised so much. i think your sympathy for him is misplaced.
I believe that nit picking and going in a thread just for the purpose of nit picking and being critics, is not the way to go.

The way you can show me, you don't like my thread, is not to come into it. Of course there is no Drama then and the us against them of course.

I think I was a big part of the TSM/PFC thing ending to tell you the truth. I would like to see the obsession with GB's Threads/posts to simmer down some. As I said a little controversey is ok and helps makes the forum lively. I think far too often we get a little too carried away with it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Thread bump for trev 33.... I would like to invite you read quickly through this thread and see for yourself where most of the negative comments come from.

I will comment on your @rusty thread later today or this evening time permitting. I have some unexpected business I have to take care of today.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Thread bump for trev 33.... I would like to invite you read quickly through this thread and see for yourself where most of the negative comments come from.
care to summarize?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
care to summarize?
Exactly what I wanted you to do...I can see why you don't want to though. 😉

Here is another one you can look at since I've been back... Ugh thread by Darvlay.

Another example: Where do most of the negative comments come from?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Exactly what I wanted you to do...I can see why you don't want to though. 😉

Here is another one you can look at since I've been back... Ugh thread by Darvlay.

Another example: Where do most of the negative comments come from?
i'm not reading through the drivel in either thread but what do you think was the catalyst to the 'negative comments' in both threads?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
i'm not reading through the drivel in either thread but what do you think was the catalyst to the 'negative comments' in both threads?
You don't have to read throught the drivel in either thread, because you were in both of them already trev and know exactly what was said.

The negative comments were not started or entertained by me. We both know it.

I know it is hard for you to make your point on how I am starting all the so called fights if you can't point out examples of where I am doing so...I have already pointed out two threads to you where I am not the the one with the negative attitude. I will of course defend myself, as you or anyone else in this forum would.

Lets see some example of where you think I am the reason for the Conflict in the forums since I came back, this is what you are talking about in the @ very rusty thread. All I have done since I came back is discuss why several posters are nit picking, at one poster. If I am missing something here please point it out to me.

I do have some things to attend to this afternoon, but I will get back to you on this, as I do think it is worth discussion. I will agree that in the "Announcement Thread" Call for Moderators, I may have said more than I should have, but I understood that it was up for discussion. There were certain people I didn't think would make good Mods and I said so.

Vote Up
Vote Down

HAY GUYZ!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
You don't have to read throught the drivel in either thread, because you were in both of them already trev and know exactly what was said.

The negative comments were not started or entertained by me. We both know it.

I know it is hard for you to make your point on how I am starting all the so called fights if you can't point out examples of where I ...[text shortened]... or discussion. There were certain people I didn't think would make good Mods and I said so.
just because i may have posted in both threads doesn't mean that i read everything in them...

why do you think it's always you involved in the fights?

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
just because i may have posted in both threads doesn't mean that i read everything in them...

why do you think it's always you involved in the fights?
Conversations or discussing on my part, not a fight.
Probably because I am not a yes boy to the friends group. I say what is on my mind, and do not try and candy coat anything. If I see a bunch of people nit-picking at one person, I will say something to those people involved, ESPECIALLY if the person is an interwebz friend of mine. Although I would do the same for you or anyone else.

I am not the one that is calling any names, since by return. All name calling does is make the person doing it look bad. Not to say I am an angel and have never done so in the past. Since I have come back, I am not the one making the negative statements to start the converstation off with.

I am sure there are those who would be quite happy if I would crawl under that rock and stay there. But hell, like you yourself would say who wants to make them happy. You are from perfect and do enough nit picking and pot stiring of your own. I think one needs to clean up their own back yard before they start in on talking about how bad their neightbours back yard is? I am actually trying to make improvements to mine. 😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Conversations or discussing on my part, not a fight.
Probably because I am not a yes boy to the friends group. I say what is on my mind, and do not try and candy coat anything. If I see a bunch of people nit-picking at one person, I will say something to those people involved, ESPECIALLY if the person is an interwebz friend of mine. Although I would do t ...[text shortened]... ut how bad their neightbours back yard is? I am actually trying to make improvements to mine. 😉
pots are there to be stirred.

have you answered either of my questions yet?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by trev33
pots are there to be stirred.

have you answered either of my questions yet?
I have certainly answered more of your questions than you have of mine.

I feel it is VR 1 trev33 0 ! 😏

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I have certainly answered more of your questions than you have of mine.

I feel it is VR 1 trev33 0 ! 😏
What's the score against that wall of yours?

Rusty 35687 - Wall 0

All scored with the head.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
What's the score against that wall of yours?

Rusty 35687 - Wall 0

All scored with the head.
Entertainment Value 0, But nice try Paly. 😉 I am sure your buds will be impressed, and that of course is the most important part.

Have you got your H1N1 flu shot?