17 Apr 04
Originally posted by kirksey957😲 I once reached the top 40 with a rating in the 1500s!
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
Just goes to show how rapidly RHP has grown in the last few years. I wonder, if you listed all correspondence chess sites by numbers of players, how would we rate? Amazingly, RHP's profile on Google isn't that great... it's only 10th for online chess, and under correspondence chess it appears on page 4. Everyone who has a website, do your bit by linking to RHP!
17 Apr 04
Originally posted by kirksey957Kirksey ...
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
I did post something fairly similar about a month ago (17 player were over 2000) and was asking for your thoughts when the to 20 have 2000+ ...
I'm next for the 2000+ (lol, not really)
The Metal Pawn
17 Apr 04
Originally posted by The Slow Pawnwell you beat me so you must be at least 2500 rating.
Kirksey ...
I did post something fairly similar about a month ago (17 player were over 2000) and was asking for your thoughts when the to 20 have 2000+ ...
I'm next for the 2000+ (lol, not really)
The Metal Pawn
18 Apr 04
Originally posted by ivanhoeOn Gameknot players over 2000 are173,the first is 2318...........
Matches between a RHP team and teams of other chess-sites might give an answer as to whether our RHP ratings are too high or too low in comparison with the ratings on other sites.
I'm all for it .... ahaa ... we'll crush them !
18 Apr 04
Originally posted by TDR1It's a complicate formula for ELO rating .
yeh but ravello how is their scoring done?
However as NicolaiS stated,RHP players seems to be better:I played 11 games on Game knot and now I've a 1347 rating(!!) ,I won my first 7 games (includind a 6 moves mate with a bishop)and started with a p 1464!!!!!!On RHP I never reached this levels and I guess it's because RHP users are more experienced while Gameknot's are not good as their rating shows.
I don't really know if RHP ratings are calculated too low or is ELO rating exagerated................any thoughts?
18 Apr 04
i love the way rhp advertises-over 60'000 players! there's over 70'000, but the other advert is probubly closer to the truth as many will be inactive. but we you never know...all mgiht be active!
but GK-advertises 147'415 players, and 52'533 games in progress...so-say an average of 10 gaems per player? go figure...
18 Apr 04
Originally posted by kirksey957This system will provide players who stay with points from those who do not stop.So players join,don't complete games,points are awarded by time out.Everyones ratings go up because people start games they don't finish.It all balances but you are only looking at the visible.
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
18 Apr 04
Originally posted by geniusgood point:I noticed that with that many players ,in two weeks I'm playing on GK,the maximum number of players online was 900,today at some point there were only 398 players online.............
i love the way rhp advertises-over 60'000 players! there's over 70'000, but the other advert is probubly closer to the truth as many will be inactive. but we you never know...all mgiht be active!
but GK-advertises 147'415 players, and 52'533 games in progress...so-say an average of 10 gaems per player? go figure...
I'm curious to know the daily average number of players on RHP......I guess they are thousands........... 🙄