Go back
It finally happened

It finally happened

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
😲 I once reached the top 40 with a rating in the 1500s!

Just goes to show how rapidly RHP has grown in the last few years. I wonder, if you listed all correspondence chess sites by numbers of players, how would we rate? Amazingly, RHP's profile on Google isn't that great... it's only 10th for online chess, and under correspondence chess it appears on page 4. Everyone who has a website, do your bit by linking to RHP!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
Kirksey ...

I did post something fairly similar about a month ago (17 player were over 2000) and was asking for your thoughts when the to 20 have 2000+ ...

I'm next for the 2000+ (lol, not really)

The Metal Pawn

Vote Up
Vote Down


Matches between a RHP team and teams of other chess-sites might give an answer as to whether our RHP ratings are too high or too low in comparison with the ratings on other sites.

I'm all for it .... ahaa ... we'll crush them !

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Matches between a RHP team and teams of other chess-sites might give an answer as to whether our RHP ratings are too high or too low in comparison with the ratings on other sites.
Now that's a great idea.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by The Slow Pawn
Kirksey ...

I did post something fairly similar about a month ago (17 player were over 2000) and was asking for your thoughts when the to 20 have 2000+ ...

I'm next for the 2000+ (lol, not really)

The Metal Pawn
well you beat me so you must be at least 2500 rating.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I am hoping to have a 0 rating before long :-)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe

Matches between a RHP team and teams of other chess-sites might give an answer as to whether our RHP ratings are too high or too low in comparison with the ratings on other sites.

I'm all for it .... ahaa ... we'll crush them !
On Gameknot players over 2000 are173,the first is 2318...........

Vote Up
Vote Down

yeh but ravello how is their scoring done?

Vote Up
Vote Down

My rating at Gameknot stays easily above 1200 while on RHP I have far more trouble to stay there... to my humble opinion the players on RHP are better .... or, 😀 , I play better on Gameknot. ... nah ... guess you guys and girls are just better.

Vote Up
Vote Down

It's a great idea, but... is it possible?

Let's ask Russ... 🙂

Olav

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TDR1
yeh but ravello how is their scoring done?
It's a complicate formula for ELO rating .
However as NicolaiS stated,RHP players seems to be better:I played 11 games on Game knot and now I've a 1347 rating(!!) ,I won my first 7 games (includind a 6 moves mate with a bishop)and started with a p 1464!!!!!!On RHP I never reached this levels and I guess it's because RHP users are more experienced while Gameknot's are not good as their rating shows.
I don't really know if RHP ratings are calculated too low or is ELO rating exagerated................any thoughts?

Vote Up
Vote Down

i love the way rhp advertises-over 60'000 players! there's over 70'000, but the other advert is probubly closer to the truth as many will be inactive. but we you never know...all mgiht be active!

but GK-advertises 147'415 players, and 52'533 games in progress...so-say an average of 10 gaems per player? go figure...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kirksey957
The entire top 20 is now rated over 2000. What next?
This system will provide players who stay with points from those who do not stop.So players join,don't complete games,points are awarded by time out.Everyones ratings go up because people start games they don't finish.It all balances but you are only looking at the visible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by genius
i love the way rhp advertises-over 60'000 players! there's over 70'000, but the other advert is probubly closer to the truth as many will be inactive. but we you never know...all mgiht be active!

but GK-advertises 147'415 players, and 52'533 games in progress...so-say an average of 10 gaems per player? go figure...
good point:I noticed that with that many players ,in two weeks I'm playing on GK,the maximum number of players online was 900,today at some point there were only 398 players online.............
I'm curious to know the daily average number of players on RHP......I guess they are thousands........... 🙄