Originally posted by NordlysA lot of people keep trying to justify a wrong by pointing aut a greater wrong.
Indeed. And what's doing more harm, dirty talk on the internet or drunk driving?
I guess it's just a matter of you looking at something and saying "Well it could be worse" and me looking at the same thing and saying "Let's make it better."
Originally posted by Red NightTalking dirty isn't wrong, it's wrong to you.
A lot of people keep trying to justify a wrong by pointing aut a greater wrong.
I guess it's just a matter of you looking at something and saying "Well it could be worse" and me looking at the same thing and saying "Let's make it better."
Stop assuming that everyone has the same morals as yourself and judging them based on that.
Originally posted by dagsI don't recall hearing from you on this subject before. Are you new to the debate?
Talking dirty isn't wrong, it's wrong to you.
Stop assuming that everyone has the same morals as yourself and judging them based on that.
The issue wasn't talking dirty. We all agree that people have a right to free speech.
There were actually two issues:
1. Needlessly and senselessly bullying and attacking people.
2. Having sexually explicit conversations in the presence of minors.
We've really hashed these issues out at great length and numerous people of commented on the success of those efforts. Which is great. I'd prefer not to re-open that kettle of worms at this time.
Originally posted by Red NightI agree. Anyway, the subject was drunk driving, and you saying we shouldn't judge someone for doing that. I think you might see it differently if you had been working with kids who had suffered severe brain damage due to a car crash.
We've really hashed these issues out at great length and numerous people of commented on the success of those efforts. Which is great. I'd prefer not to re-open that kettle of worms at this time.
Originally posted by Nordlysor someone like me whos dad was killed by a drunk driver
I agree. Anyway, the subject was drunk driving, and you saying we shouldn't judge someone for doing that. I think you might see it differently if you had been working with kids who had suffered severe brain damage due to a car crash.
he was only sent down for 5 years and only served 2 and he had already had his licence taken away for 3 other drink offences
hows that justice
Originally posted by Red NightIt just seems a little odd how you will jump up in defence of a drink driver but not a bully or someone who feels the need to talk about sex infront of minors.
I don't recall hearing from you on this subject before. Are you new to the debate?
The issue wasn't talking dirty. We all agree that people have a right to free speech.
There were actually two issues:
1. Needlessly and senselessly bullying and attacking people.
2. Having sexually explicit conversations in the presence of minors.
We've re ...[text shortened]... those efforts. Which is great. I'd prefer not to re-open that kettle of worms at this time.
Bullys bully people for a reason the same as people drive drunk but I don't recall seeing you say we should try to understand the bullys reason for being a bully or the sex talker.
Originally posted by NordlysThat's awful.
I agree. Anyway, the subject was drunk driving, and you saying we shouldn't judge someone for doing that. I think you might see it differently if you had been working with kids who had suffered severe brain damage due to a car crash.
But I don't see how calling each other names or bashing each other with bricks is going to help.
So you do music therapy with these children?