Go back
K-Pax

K-Pax

General

DM
Super Hero!

Joined
18 Apr 04
Moves
5732
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

So who has seen K-Pax?

I saw it for the first time yesterday and thought it was a great film.
Any opinions on whether he was a strange deluded individual or whether he was an alien?

CC
Sparky

Hendersonville, NC

Joined
31 Jan 03
Moves
220186
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Danger Mouse
So who has seen K-Pax?

I saw it for the first time yesterday and thought it was a great film.
Any opinions on whether he was a strange deluded individual or whether he was an alien?
Of course he was an alien. 🙂

~ Cheshire Cat 😀

P.S. I thought that this was one of his best roles. 🙂

DM
Super Hero!

Joined
18 Apr 04
Moves
5732
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Are you absolutely sure. What are you basing that on? He couid have just been really intelligent and just suffering from post tramatic stress?

CC
Sparky

Hendersonville, NC

Joined
31 Jan 03
Moves
220186
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Danger Mouse
Are you absolutely sure. What are you basing that on? He couid have just been really intelligent and just suffering from post tramatic stress?
No, I am not absolutely sure. It has been quite a while since I saw it last. 🙂

~ Cheshire Cat 😀

f

Boulder, CO

Joined
04 Aug 04
Moves
1108
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Danger Mouse
So who has seen K-Pax?

I saw it for the first time yesterday and thought it was a great film.
Any opinions on whether he was a strange deluded individual or whether he was an alien?

I really liked it, have seen it like four times.

The movie intimates that when the guy gets in trouble, he calls on K-Pax to come help him, as if he inhabits his body -- when he leaves, for instance, the guy is left as a hollow shell. Yet, when talking to the psychotherapist, he tells him he looks like he does because it's the most energy-efficient form -- like a bubble. I think that's sort of paradoxical.

Anyway, I don't think anyone could know what he showed the astronomers, so I say alien.

-f

DM
Super Hero!

Joined
18 Apr 04
Moves
5732
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Yeah, that's why I thought he was an alien too but then he was an astromoner as a kid and was supposedly very inteligent. He could therefore just be a genius that had just suffered a bad time and was hiding from it. But then there was the fact that Betty(?) went missing at the end...

pradtf

VeggieChess

Joined
03 Jun 02
Moves
7483
Clock
04 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Danger Mouse
So who has seen K-Pax?

I saw it for the first time yesterday and thought it was a great film.
Any opinions on whether he was a strange deluded individual or whether he was an alien?
kpax is one of our all time fav films!
"every being in the universe knows the difference between right and wrong, mark"
i think prot was a kpaxian.

in friendship,
prad

C
Not Aleister

Control room

Joined
17 Apr 02
Moves
91813
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Danger Mouse
Any opinions on whether he was a strange deluded individual or whether he was an alien?
Maybe he's a strange, deluded alien?

d

Joined
05 Oct 04
Moves
230
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Ill second that - Prot was a strange individual. Bubble or no.
Got to be alien - how did he escape the ward for those few days ?

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Alien. Of course.

The most interesting thing was his theory of the universe at the end:

We live the same lives over and over again, because the universe is an ever repeating loop.

This was my pet theory at university. It is beautiful because it solves the philosophical problem of how did the universe begin : It has always been there.
Also it make nonsensical concepts such as God well and truly redundant.
Empirically it is borne out by astonomical observations such as the universe's rate of expansion is decreasing, leading to an eventual collapse and thus the start of the next identical cycle.
PERFECT!!

d

Joined
05 Oct 04
Moves
230
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Its fine to say that something is in a recurring/recursive loop.
But doesn't something have to be in place before the loop can start ?

Therefore how can you quantify God as nonsense ?

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dataBURN
Its fine to say that something is in a recurring/recursive loop.
But doesn't something have to be in place before the loop can start ?

Therefore how can you quantify God as nonsense ?
So you would have God in place to create the universe?

Fine. Now how did God come into existence? Oh, he's always been there, has he? You are stuck with the same problem that you attempted to overcome!

The universe's cycle is ever repeating. It has always been there. The loop is ever repeating, infinitely.

Logically this makes sense as you cannot create something from nothing. A total vacuum will ever remain so without external forces.

d

Joined
05 Oct 04
Moves
230
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Far be it from me to proclaim that there's a God. I'm not.

Your now mixing the beliefs of faith and understanding of science. And so far as falible humans, we have said that these do not complement each other.

Science has said "big bang" or repeating loop. And faith has said that God is not a part of this universe - it is his creation.

I dont think these are comparable.

You believe one or the other.

h

Cosmos

Joined
21 Jan 04
Moves
11184
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

I did not mix faith and science. I used science to refute faith and the concept of God.
You were the one defending the idea of God.

The true answer is not Big bang OR ever repeating cycle as you suggest. Rather, it is a hybrid of the two. It is a infinite loop whose starting point is punctuated by each identical big bang when the universe collapses into itself. This is when all the matter in the universe collides together, probably at the speed of light.

f

Boulder, CO

Joined
04 Aug 04
Moves
1108
Clock
05 Oct 04
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by howardgee
I did not mix faith and science. I used science to refute faith and the concept of God.
You were the one defending the idea of God.

The true answer is not Big bang OR ever repeating cycle as you suggest. Rather, it is a hybrid of the two. It is a infinite loop whose starting point is punctuated by each identical big bang when the universe collapses ...[text shortened]... This is when all the matter in the universe collides together, probably at the speed of light.

...and you know this...how? I'd say that from your vantage point, you might as well be deaf, dumb, and blind.

-f

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.